Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-014-5658-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stepwise synthesis of cuprous oxide nanoparticles with adjustable structures and growth model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TEM result of Cu 2 O (Figure A) exhibits a spherical hollow-centered structure (or nanoshells) with a diameter in the range of 170–210 nm, and the shell thickness of the NSs is about 45–50 nm. The spherical shells are not so compact, and there are some pores in the shells, which is similar to the published results. ,, The TEM image of the prepared CuS NSs (Figure B) also displays nanoshells with size near 200 nm, and the rough shells are composed of many small nanocrystals. There are small voids in the shells, similar to the reported morphology of CuS NSs. The HRTEM image of CuS NSs (Figure C) shows the interplanar spacings of 0.171 and 0.331 nm, corresponding to the (108) plane and (100) plane of CuS, respectively. , The above results show that when Cu 2 O NSs were transformed into CuS NSs, the hollow-centered structure remained; however, the surfaces of the CuS NSs are rougher than those of the Cu 2 O NSs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The TEM result of Cu 2 O (Figure A) exhibits a spherical hollow-centered structure (or nanoshells) with a diameter in the range of 170–210 nm, and the shell thickness of the NSs is about 45–50 nm. The spherical shells are not so compact, and there are some pores in the shells, which is similar to the published results. ,, The TEM image of the prepared CuS NSs (Figure B) also displays nanoshells with size near 200 nm, and the rough shells are composed of many small nanocrystals. There are small voids in the shells, similar to the reported morphology of CuS NSs. The HRTEM image of CuS NSs (Figure C) shows the interplanar spacings of 0.171 and 0.331 nm, corresponding to the (108) plane and (100) plane of CuS, respectively. , The above results show that when Cu 2 O NSs were transformed into CuS NSs, the hollow-centered structure remained; however, the surfaces of the CuS NSs are rougher than those of the Cu 2 O NSs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The growth strategy of the CuS NSs is shown in Scheme B. CuS NSs were prepared using Cu 2 O NSs as templates, which were fabricated according to our previous method. , CuS NSs were obtained by the reaction between Cu 2 O NSs and Na 2 S at 60 °C for 15 min. The concentrations of the Cu 2 O NSs and Na 2 S are 1.4 × 10 –4 (w/w) and 2.4 × 10 –4 (w/w), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Cu foam-supported Cu 2 O electrode can meet the glucose detection for human serum over a wide concentration range (1 μM to 11.4 mM). Our group fabricated hollow Cu 2 O–PVP NPs by stepwise controlling the addition of the reducer [49] and constructed a non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on the hollow Cu 2 O nanosphere in Nafion matrix on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) [50]. Results showed that the hollow Cu 2 O nanospheres have a remarkable electrocatalytic activity for the oxidation of glucose without loading any enzymes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the Cu 2+ ions were reduced by the hydrazine, forming the cuprous oxide (Cu 2 O) nuclei. Then, the Cu 2 O nuclei were assembled to be the solid spherical aggregates. , As shown in Figure A, the average hydrated particle size of Cu 2 O@Dex was about 174 nm. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) spectra shown in Figure B and Figure S1 and the SEM spectra in Figure S2 exhibited that the particle was formed by nanoaggregates of Cu 2 O nuclei with the size of about 130 nm and wrapped in Dex, which was 1–5 nm in thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%