Appendicular skeletal traits are used to quantify changes in morphological disparity and morphospace occupation across the fish-tetrapod transition, and to explore the informativeness of different data partitions in phylogeny reconstruction. Anterior appendicular data yield trees that differ little from those built from the full character set, whilst posterior appendicular data result in considerable loss of phylogenetic resolution and tree branch rearrangements. Overall, there is significant incongruence in the signals associated with pectoral and pelvic data. The appendicular skeletons of fish and tetrapods attain similar levels of morphological disparity (at least when data are rarefied at the maximum sample size for fish in our study) and occupy similarly sized regions of morphospace. However, fish appear more dispersed in morphospace than tetrapods do. All taxa show a heterogeneous distribution in morphospace, and there is a clear separation between fish and tetrapods despite the presence of several evolutionarily intermediate taxa.Key words: empirical morphospace, fins, fish, girdles, limbs, tetrapods. 2 THE origin of limbed vertebrates (tetrapods) from fish is among the most iconic, best known, and best studied of all major evolutionary transitions (Coates et al. 2008;Shubin, 2009;Clack 2009. This event entailed remarkable changes in structural complexity, ecological variety, and morphofunctional diversity Shubin et al. 2009;Neenan et al. 2014), and is therefore of considerable significance to biologists interested in tempo and mode of evolutionary radiations. Phylogenetic, palaeoecological, and functional aspects of the fish-tetrapod transition are most appropriately addressed by analysing changes in the appendicular skeleton. This is because the elaborate architecture of fins, limbs, and girdles offers a rich source of cladistic and biomechanical data (e.g. Clack 2012; Pierce et al. 2012; see also Ruta 2011), and permits detailed investigations into patterns and rates of trait change near the origin of a major animal radiation (e.g. Clack 2009Coates et al. 2002 Coates et al. , 2008Ruta et al. 2006;. More broadly, fossil, embryological, and comparative anatomical data on the appendicular skeleton have promoted the interdisciplinary dialogue between evolutionary and developmental biologists (e.g. Hall 2007;Shubin et al. 2009;.The last ten years have witnessed an astonishing proliferation of fossil finds spanning the fishtetrapod transition, spurring the publication of increasingly detailed and refined matrices of skeletal characters and significant novel interpretations of existing data (e.g. Boisvert et al. 2008;Callier et al. 2009;Ahlberg 2011;Pierce et al. 2012Smithson and Clack 2013; Anderson et al. 2015).However, recent cladistic analyses vary in the extent to which appendicular characters are atomised and coded. In his compendium of appendicular characters for some of the most adequately known fin-and limb-bearing stem-group tetrapods and early-branching crown-group tetrapod clades, Ruta ...