2012
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2012.743116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stepping back to move forward? Exploring Outdoor Education students' fresher and graduate identities and their impact on employment destinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if Stott, Zaitseva, and Cui's (2012) claim that '(s)tudents are allowed to experiment with identity while learning' (p. 2), is correct, the question must then be asked, are these students also actively aware of the processes of identity development in which they are involved; that is, are they learning about identity and its development?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even if Stott, Zaitseva, and Cui's (2012) claim that '(s)tudents are allowed to experiment with identity while learning' (p. 2), is correct, the question must then be asked, are these students also actively aware of the processes of identity development in which they are involved; that is, are they learning about identity and its development?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is perhaps unsurprising, since 'student identity is multi-layered, multi-sourced, evolving, and at times, paradoxical in beliefs of self, position, relationships, and learning contexts' (Kasworm 2010, 143). Stott, Zaitseva, and Cui (2012), in their research, attempt to identify characteristics of 'fresher' student identity through data from an induction questionnaire that asks incoming students about their:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We examined articles featured in three key reviews of graduate employability literature, namely Lees (), Tomlinson () and Bowers‐Brown and Harvey (). Drawing on the extant graduate employability literature discussed across these three reviews, we arrived at five themes, which have been identified as key: Employability as core purpose of HE (identified as a key theme by Holmes, ); Graduate skills (generic vs. technical) (see Lambert, ); Curriculum and pedagogy for employability (see Butcher et al ., ); Measuring success of graduate employability practices (see Stott et al ., ); and The interaction between employers and academia (see Agrawal, ). …”
Section: Graduate Employability Employment and Heismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' learning in higher education however is influenced by various factors such as learning facilities offered by higher education providers, national education policy imposed to higher education providers (Roselina, 2009;Leathwood & O'Connell, 2003), higher education providers' philosophies and objectives, prospective employers' expectation (Hinchliffe & Jolly, 2011;Boden & Neveda, 2010;Bui & Porter, 2010), students' interaction with environment (Kaufman & Feldman, 2004) and their unique expectations, motivations, goals and experiences (Cantwell, 2008). Knowing students' initial motivations to enrol in specific academic programmes helps to identify their progress of person capacity to secure a role in a specific community of practice, and starts to develop their professional identity (Stott et al, 2012).…”
Section: Professional Identity Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%