2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2003.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stepping and kicking behaviour during milking in relation to response in human–animal interaction test and clinical health in loose housed dairy cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

7
66
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
66
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They have been reported as having a negative effect on cow comfort, locomotion, and claw health (Fjeldaas et al, 2011) and will likely result in poor milk production. However, Rousing et al (2004) found no lameness or other signs of leg disorders with stepping and kicking during milking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They have been reported as having a negative effect on cow comfort, locomotion, and claw health (Fjeldaas et al, 2011) and will likely result in poor milk production. However, Rousing et al (2004) found no lameness or other signs of leg disorders with stepping and kicking during milking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There is clear evidence that the assessment of cattle welfare must include the milking routine (Wenzel, 2003;Rousing et al, 2004) because it is a daily process throughout the lifetime of dairy cows. Milking is a convenient time to assess animal welfare because cows show their sensitivities, which could lead to different stress responses if consistent behavioral routines are interrupted (Hopster et al, 1998;Gygax et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Changes in the autonomic nervous system activity of animals differing in stress reactivity are suggested to be highly different (Koolhaas et al, 2010); therefore, HR and HRV may effectively represent immediate autonomic responses of animals differing in natural individual variation in quantitative (stress reactivity) and qualitative (coping styles) dimensions in respect of stress. Studying HR and HRV in relation with stress reactivity and coping might also provide more detailed information on the physiological background of the human-cattle relationship as well, the importance of which has been shown earlier by several studies, on health and welfare (Rousing et al, 2004) and milk production (Breuer et al, 2000; Dodzi and Muchenje, 2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 95%