2014 American Control Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2014.6859239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Step size analysis in discrete-time dynamic average consensus

Abstract: This paper deals with the problem of reaching the average consensus of a set of time-varying reference signals in a distributed manner. We analyze the approach initially presented in [1], giving an alternative proof of convergence which leads to larger, more realistic bounds on the step sizes that guarantee a steady-state error upper-bounded by a given constant. The interest of the new results appear when the algorithm is used in real networks, where there are constraints in the communication rate between the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…m times (a) Dynamic average consensus algorithm (32) in [66] where ∆ (m) = (1 − z −1 ) m is the m th divided difference (see also [67] for a stepsize analysis). The performance does not degrade when the graph is timevarying, but the estimate is delayed by m iterations.…”
Section: Signals With a Known Model (Discrete Time)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…m times (a) Dynamic average consensus algorithm (32) in [66] where ∆ (m) = (1 − z −1 ) m is the m th divided difference (see also [67] for a stepsize analysis). The performance does not degrade when the graph is timevarying, but the estimate is delayed by m iterations.…”
Section: Signals With a Known Model (Discrete Time)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimate of the average, however, is delayed by m iterations due to the transfer function having a factor of z −m between the input and output. This problem is (32) in [66] where ∆ (m) = (1 − z −1 ) m is the m th divided difference (see also [67] for a stepsize analysis). The performance does not degrade when the graph is timevarying, but the estimate is delayed by m iterations.…”
Section: Signals With a Known Model (Discrete Time)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, we design a distributed algorithm that steers a group of heterogeneous LTI followers to be at the sampled states of the leader at finite time just before the next sampled state is obtained. We note that practical one step lagged tracking has also been used in [26], [27], [28] for a set of dynamic average consensus algorithms with asymptotic tracking behavior. Our solution is inspired by the minimum energy controller design [29] in the classical optimal control theory, and is proposed for problems where the interaction topology of the followers plus the leader is an acyclic digraph with the leader as the global sink.…”
Section: Statement Of Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the idea of event-triggered control for multiagent systems [33], we consider the following event-triggered versions of the robust dynamic average consensus algorithm and the adaptive law given in (13) and (12), respectively:…”
Section: A Dynamic Event-triggered Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%