A therosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) is more common than has been previously appreciated 1,2 and is an independent predictor of death regardless of the presence, severity, or method of revascularization of coronary artery disease. [3][4][5] Among 1235 patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography, multivariate analysis demonstrated that RAS (Ͼ50%) was a stronger independent predictor of all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 7.0) than congestive heart failure (RR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.1), elevated left ventricular ejection fraction (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.2), or decreased renal function (serum creatinine) (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5). 3 A subsequent expansion of that study group, extended to 3987 patients undergoing abdominal aortography at the time of diagnostic cardiac catheterization, identified an incremental effect of the severity of RAS on the 4-year mortality rates. They found that a mild-to-moderate (50%) RAS was associated with a 30% 4-year mortality rate, which almost doubled (52%) with severe (Ͼ95%) RAS. 4 The cause-and-effect relation between RAS and death is uncertain. It is possible that the presence of RAS is simply a marker for more diffuse or extensive atherosclerosis, which would result in more vascular-related deaths. However, there is one study 5 that raises the possibility that the treatment of RAS with a renal stent in patients with renal insufficiency can improve mortality rates. In this trial, patients who improved their renal function after renal stent placement had significantly better survival rates compared with those whose renal function did not improve.A dedicated educational effort aimed at improving the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial disease, including RAS, has been supported over the past 10 years by several professional societies. 6 -8 There is now objective evidence from the Medicare database that this effort to increase the number of patients with RAS who receive treatment has been successful, particularly among invasive cardiologists. 9 Defining the appropriate strategy for screening high-risk populations, determining the risk-to-benefit ratio for treatment, and avoiding complications of percutaneous renal revascularization is a continuously evolving process.
PrevalenceAn ultrasound screening study in 834 free-living Medicare patients, with a mean age of 77 years, found significant (Ͼ60%) RAS in 6.8%. 10 There were almost twice as many men (9.1%) as women (5.5%, Pϭ0.053), with an even distribution among white (6.9%) and black (6.7%) participants. In a series of unselected autopsies in 221 patients older than 50 years, the prevalence of RAS (Ͼ50%) was 27%. 11 The prevalence of RAS rose to 53% if there was a history of a diastolic hypertension (Ͼ100 mm Hg).Renovascular hypertension is the most common secondary cause (Ϸ5%) of hypertension, and there are several clinical subsets of patients, particularly those with known atherosclerotic vascular disease, who have an increased incidence of RAS. 12,13 I...