2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stent placement in esophageal cancer as a bridge to surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, PGA sheet, a biodegradable suture material, could be used to prevent post-ESD esophageal stricture because of its advantages of reinforcing suture and minimal scar contracture, although the limitation of instability between the PGA sheet and wound surface after long-term pasting still exists[ 9 - 11 ]. Another popular method is stent placement, which is frequently used with covered self-expandable metal material, and has been verified to have curative effects on refractory stricture to some extent, although its complications, such as translocation and promotion of granulation tissue proliferation, still affect its clinical outcomes in EC patients[ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, PGA sheet, a biodegradable suture material, could be used to prevent post-ESD esophageal stricture because of its advantages of reinforcing suture and minimal scar contracture, although the limitation of instability between the PGA sheet and wound surface after long-term pasting still exists[ 9 - 11 ]. Another popular method is stent placement, which is frequently used with covered self-expandable metal material, and has been verified to have curative effects on refractory stricture to some extent, although its complications, such as translocation and promotion of granulation tissue proliferation, still affect its clinical outcomes in EC patients[ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The indications for SEMS use have expanded to include relief from dysphagia in patients with resectable EC and for those who require neoadjuvant treatment before resection. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Self-expanding covered metallic stent insertion can immediately relieve dysphagia and allow for the maintenance of oral nutrition, 17 and a series of articles highlight that their use is associated with safe early results. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] However, the impact of SEMS insertion on oncologic outcomes in the neoadjuvant setting is unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its usefulness in palliating symptoms, the use of bridge SEMS placement has a negative impact on oncological outcomes according to recent studies. [27][28][29] Mariette et al 28 reported that patients who underwent SEMS placement as bridging therapy had earlier recurrence (7 vs. 9 months) and a lower 3-year overall survival rate (25 vs. 44%). Increased incidence of SEMSrelated complications, mechanical injury caused by SEMS, Fig.…”
Section: Stent Placement In Various Situations Stent Placement As a Bmentioning
confidence: 99%