Stent or Shunt, what could be better for children with duct dependent pulmonary circulation?

Abstract

Background Systemic to pulmonary shunt (Shunt) is offered for children with duct dependent pulmonary circulation to augment pulmonary flow. Recently patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stent (Stent) is widely used as an alternative method. We aimed to compare post intervention outcomes in children underwent either procedure. Methods Infants under 3 months who had an initial palliation by Shunt or Stent were retrospectively reviewed between 2008 and 2016, then followed till the second intervention or 1 year whichever earlier. Results 187 patients (110 Shunt and 77 Stent) were included. Initial weight and pulmonary artery (PA) branches size were similar between the groups. Shunt patients had more shock preoperatively and required more emergency intervention. Stent group showed less ICU stay 4 (1–8) vs 13 (7–23) days, p < 0.0001 and less positive pressure ventilation days 1 (0–2) vs 5.5 (3–11), p < 0.0001. However, Stent group had more symptomatic arterial and deep venous thromboses. In Stent patients the branch PAs growth was better and more homogeneous. At follow-up, no difference between groups regarding cumulative readmission days to hospital, hemoglobin levels and the weight percentile for age. Mortality was not different with a tendency to be higher in the Shunt group (13%) compared to the Stent group (5%), p 0.1. Conclusions The implantation of PDA stent in patients with duct dependent pulmonary circulation results in a smoother ICU course and a shorter hospital stay, with higher risk of vascular injury. Shunt and Stent procedures have a good outcome for PA growth, somatic growth and survival.