1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00320-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stent or angioplasty after recanalization of chronic coronary occlusions? (the SARECCO trial)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These included 23 studies comparing stenting with PTCA in patients with non-specific CAD, 11 comparing stents with PTCA following AMI, 59-69 eight 70-77 including patients with small coronary arteries and eight including patients whose vessels had chronic total occlusion (CTO). [78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85] Thirty-nine studies were assessed from reports published in peer-reviewed journals. The remainder were abstracts of conference proceedings.…”
Section: Ptca: Included Studies Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included 23 studies comparing stenting with PTCA in patients with non-specific CAD, 11 comparing stents with PTCA following AMI, 59-69 eight 70-77 including patients with small coronary arteries and eight including patients whose vessels had chronic total occlusion (CTO). [78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85] Thirty-nine studies were assessed from reports published in peer-reviewed journals. The remainder were abstracts of conference proceedings.…”
Section: Ptca: Included Studies Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results have improved because of recent advances in technology and increased operator experience. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Recent studies show that successful PCI of a CTO is associated with improved survival; 8,9 however, the total fluoroscopic time (TFT) tends to be long in this procedure compared with PCI for non-CTO. 10 The patient's entrance skin doses (ESD) are higher 10,11 and severe skin injury can occur, so the physician must estimate the ESD in order to prevent radiation skin injuries during the procedure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stent implantation decreased the restenosis rates compared to PTCA, however, the restenosis rates in PCI for CTO are still high compared to PCI for stenotic lesions. [2][3][4][5][6][7] The introduction of drug-eluting stents can be promising in this era. Nakamura, et al 12) showed that few cardiac events occurred in the 60 patients who underwent implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent compared to 120 patients in the bare metal stent group after one year (P < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the development of interventional techniques, many clinicians prefer not to recanalize the CTO by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) because of the difficulty and low clinical success of PCI for CTO. The restenosis rate for PCI in CTOs is still higher than stenotic lesions despite the routine usage of stents, which have successfully decreased the restenosis rates [2][3][4][5][6][7] when compared to only percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%