2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.11.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stent implantation for severe pulmonary vein stenosis or occlusion secondary to atrial fibrillation ablation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PVS after radiofrequency ablation is an uncommon but serious complication [6]. In symptomatic cases, PVS stenting can provide hemodynamic relief of pulmonary circulation [2]. However, like our patient, who had a bleeding complication and relative contraindication to chronic oral anticoagulation with warfarin or NOACs, the potential risk of LAA thrombosis and concomitant stroke are challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PVS after radiofrequency ablation is an uncommon but serious complication [6]. In symptomatic cases, PVS stenting can provide hemodynamic relief of pulmonary circulation [2]. However, like our patient, who had a bleeding complication and relative contraindication to chronic oral anticoagulation with warfarin or NOACs, the potential risk of LAA thrombosis and concomitant stroke are challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is an uncommon but potentially serious complication following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) [1]. Obviously, in symptomatic cases with severe PVS, early PVS stenting is needed to restore pulmonary flow [2,3]. However, high risk of cardiac thrombosis remains if AF is recurrent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several studies, the rate of restenosis has been shown to be lower with stenting than with balloon angioplasty [ 6 , 12 ]. In one case series of 56 patients with RFA-induced PV stenosis, stenting was found to be 95.8% successful, with significantly improved pressure gradients, vessel caliber, and symptoms [ 13 ]. Bare metal stents (which were used in our patient) have been shown to have a lower rate of restenosis than drug eluting stents [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence indicating that stent implantation with balloon dilatation is characterized by a better short-term outcome and lower risk of PV restenosis compared with PTA alone. 2 , 6 Indeed, more than 50% of patients will experience an early restenosis after PTA alone, 2 , 4 , 6 whereas this early risk is much lower with 16–33% after a stent placement depending on the stent size. Large-diameter stents (≥8 mm) may have a lower risk of restenosis (6.4%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%