2006
DOI: 10.1002/num.20129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stencils with isotropic discretization error for differential operators

Abstract: We derive stencils, i.e., difference schemes, for differential operators for which the discretization error becomes isotropic in the lowest order. We treat the Laplacian, Bilaplacian (=biharmonic operator), and the gradient of the Laplacian both in two and three dimensions. For three dimensions O(h 2 ) results are given while for two dimensions both O(h 2 ) and O(h 4 ) results are presented. The results are also available in electronic form as a Mathematica file. It is shown that the extra computational cost o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eq. A3 has been systematically derived by imposing conditions of rotational invariance and isotropy of the operator [46]. Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eq. A3 has been systematically derived by imposing conditions of rotational invariance and isotropy of the operator [46]. Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of system is ideal if one is interested in self-organization based on chemical gradients. Indeed, resolving diffusion on a structured grid is well documented (Douglas and Gunn, 1964;Patra and Karttunen, 2006;Strikwerda, 2004). However, it is a poor system to use when implementing mechanical properties, as the structured grid has trouble dealing with deformation and representing complex geometries.…”
Section: Structured Grid Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TABLE I. Summary of crit for either operator with 1 APE step and c SW ¼ 1, as determined from direct measurements at these couplings (with error bars) and through the fit (21 C. Comparing the scaling of decay constants at fixed r 0 M P The decay constants F , F " ss , F " cc are determined from the improved and renormalized current…”
Section: A Scale Setting and Overall Tuning Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%