2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-011-9361-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STEM Education Related Dissertation Abstracts: A Bounded Qualitative Meta-study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One is the quality of the abstracts examined in this study. Weaknesses in the structure of the abstracts were similar to the ones Banning and Folkestad (2012) found in STEM doctoral research abstracts and also similar to the weakness addressed by Kelly and Yin's (2007) work. Kelly and Yin found that many research abstracts were lacking in background and content; had unclear purpose, objective, and research questions; provided little description of setting and population/participants; included few details regarding intervention/program; had sparse information regarding methods, research design, data collection, analysis, and findings results; and provided limited conclusions and recommendations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One is the quality of the abstracts examined in this study. Weaknesses in the structure of the abstracts were similar to the ones Banning and Folkestad (2012) found in STEM doctoral research abstracts and also similar to the weakness addressed by Kelly and Yin's (2007) work. Kelly and Yin found that many research abstracts were lacking in background and content; had unclear purpose, objective, and research questions; provided little description of setting and population/participants; included few details regarding intervention/program; had sparse information regarding methods, research design, data collection, analysis, and findings results; and provided limited conclusions and recommendations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…To address the theory component of the meta-study model (Paterson et al, 2001), each dissertation abstract was examined using a classification system developed by Banning and Folkestad (2012) to see what guiding framework was mentioned, if any. The theoretical guiding framework was defined within this study as any use of paradigmatic statements, grand theories, theories of middle range, substantive theories, or models to guide the research.…”
Section: Guiding Framework Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) are important for the global competitiveness of the USA (Banning and Folkestad 2012;Holden et al 2010). The USA is increasingly reliant on the STEM workforce to maintain leadership in the world economy (Banning and Folkestad 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach was initially employed by Banning and Kuk (2009) to explore student affairs organizations and has since been utilized by other researchers in a variety of contexts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%