Stem Cells in Toxicology and Medicine 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781119135449.ch25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stem Cells in the Skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…selectable markers such as fluorescent and luminescent proteins have been widely used to track transplanted stem cells over long periods of time; [1][2][3][4] however, these markers have multiple limitations for intravital imaging, such as limited depth penetration in tissue, pronounced photo bleaching over time, and the presence of autofluorescence in surrounding tissues. [5] In addition, introducing exogenous genes may influence the function and behavior of stem cells.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/smll201703386mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…selectable markers such as fluorescent and luminescent proteins have been widely used to track transplanted stem cells over long periods of time; [1][2][3][4] however, these markers have multiple limitations for intravital imaging, such as limited depth penetration in tissue, pronounced photo bleaching over time, and the presence of autofluorescence in surrounding tissues. [5] In addition, introducing exogenous genes may influence the function and behavior of stem cells.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/smll201703386mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] In addition, introducing exogenous genes may influence the function and behavior of stem cells. [3] To circumvent these limitations, a variety of inorganic nanoparticles have been proposed as alternative imaging agents for cell tracking. [1][2][3] Despite the wide variety of imaging modalities uti lized, tracking of stem cells in vivo at a high signaltonoise ratio (SNR) typically requires excess nanoparticle loading.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/smll201703386mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation