Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006536.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction

Abstract: Despite the high degree of heterogeneity observed, the results of this systematic review suggest that moderate improvement in global heart function is significant and sustained long-term. However, because mortality rates after successful revascularization of the culprit arteries are very low, larger number of participants would be required to assess the full clinical effect of this treatment. Standardisation of methodology, cell dosing and cell product formulation, timing of cell transplantation and patient se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
232
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
7
232
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…One meta-analysis performed in 2012 of 33, randomised, controlled trials of 1765 patients who had received autologous stem or progenitor bone marrow-derived cell therapy to improve cardiac function after an acute myocardial infarction, revealed significant heterogeneity in results and reported no significant change in overall patient mortality or morbidity (as measured by hospital readmission, reinfarction or restenosis), although significant short-term improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was reported, which persisted from 12-60 months. (74) Another meta-analysis published in 2015 analysed the safety and efficacy of intracoronary cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including individual patient data from 12 randomized trials (ASTAMI, Aalst, BOOST, BONAMI, CADUCEUS, FINCELL, REGENT, REPAIR-AMI, SCAMI, SWISS-AMI, TIME, LATE-TIME; n=1252) revealed that intracoronary cell therapy provided significant heterogeneity and no overall benefit, in terms of clinical events or changes in left ventricular function.…”
Section: Cellular Gelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One meta-analysis performed in 2012 of 33, randomised, controlled trials of 1765 patients who had received autologous stem or progenitor bone marrow-derived cell therapy to improve cardiac function after an acute myocardial infarction, revealed significant heterogeneity in results and reported no significant change in overall patient mortality or morbidity (as measured by hospital readmission, reinfarction or restenosis), although significant short-term improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was reported, which persisted from 12-60 months. (74) Another meta-analysis published in 2015 analysed the safety and efficacy of intracoronary cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including individual patient data from 12 randomized trials (ASTAMI, Aalst, BOOST, BONAMI, CADUCEUS, FINCELL, REGENT, REPAIR-AMI, SCAMI, SWISS-AMI, TIME, LATE-TIME; n=1252) revealed that intracoronary cell therapy provided significant heterogeneity and no overall benefit, in terms of clinical events or changes in left ventricular function.…”
Section: Cellular Gelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glucose-insulin-potassium infusion has been purported to reduce mortality and reduce infarct size, especially for diabetic patientshowever recent trials have thrown this hypothesis into serious question [14,15].…”
Section: Pharmacotherapy For Cardioprotectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are currently many strategies for cardiac "cellular therapy" undergoing both preclinical and clinical trials [1][2][3][4]. While there has been modest success with improvement in cardiac function in some of the early human clinical trials, it is clear that injected or implanted cells do not survive, and functional improvement occurs via paracrine mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%