2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2006.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stem cell continuum: Directed differentiation hotspots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously mapped the cell cycle status of LRH cells stimulated with thrombopoietin, FLT3L, and steel factor using propidium iodide [15]. At time 0, there are either very few or no LRH stem cells in S phase, and hence there is a highly synchronous progression through cycle.…”
Section: Isolation Of Whole Bone Marrowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have previously mapped the cell cycle status of LRH cells stimulated with thrombopoietin, FLT3L, and steel factor using propidium iodide [15]. At time 0, there are either very few or no LRH stem cells in S phase, and hence there is a highly synchronous progression through cycle.…”
Section: Isolation Of Whole Bone Marrowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have further established a number of reversible functional phenotype shifts with cycle progression. We have shown that short-and long-term engraftment [9,10], adhesion protein expression [11,12], cytokine receptor expression [13], and marrow homing [14] and differentiation [15] show reversible shifts in phenotype. We have also shown that progenitor numbers vary inversely with engraftable stem cell content with cycle passage, terming this a stem cell inversion [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As engraftment potential is significantly better in cells prior to and after late S/early G2 phase, then nadirs again at the next late S/early G2 phase, these changes appear to be reversible. Their fluctuating differentiative potential results in the production of populations of specific lineages of differentiated hematopoietic cells depending on where they are in cell cycle as we have shown that HSCs at early S phase and mid S phase give rise to megakaryocytic and nonproliferative granulocytic-predominant populations (respectively) of differentiated cells in secondary culture [3]. These observations have led to the continuum model of stem cell biology, in which the differentiation potential of HSCs is linked to cell cycle [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With subsequent divisions, daughter cells obtain more differentiated characteristics and lose self-renewal potential. Contrary to this model, our group has shown that HSC are capable of reversibly changing their functional phenotype as they progress though cell cycle [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. We have used cocktails of cytokines including interleukins (ILs)-3, 6, and 11 and stem cell factor (SCF) or SCF, thrombopoietin, and FLK-2, to induce HSC to progress though cell cycle in a synchronous fashion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 In addition, by interrogating the stem cell capacity and cell cycle status of distinct subpopulations of marrow cells typically discarded during conventional stem cell isolation strategies, we have found that both the lineage-positive and lineage-negative cellular fractions contain actively cycling stem cells and that these cycling stem cells appear to be preferentially lost in standard HSC purifications. 9 Numerous older studies have shown fluctuations in stem cell homing, differentiation and engraftment capacity linked to cell cycle transit [10][11][12] and we postulate that, if marrow stem cells are cycling, they cannot be purified to 'homogeneity' as they will be continually changing their phenotype as they transit the cell cycle. We are embarking on studies tracking stem cell marker fluctuation with cell cycle progression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%