2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stellar streams around the Magellanic Clouds in 4D

Abstract: We carried out a spectroscopic follow-up program of the four new stellar stream candidates detected by in the outskirts of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) using FORS2 (VLT). The medium-resolution spectra were used to measure the line-of-sight velocities, estimate stellar metallicities and to classify stars into Blue Horizontal Branch (BHB) and Blue Straggler (BS) stars. Using the 4-D phase-space information, we attribute approximately one half of our sample to the Magellanic Clouds, while the rest is part of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference is to be expected, as each of the above methods provides the total infall mass of the LMC, including its dark halo. In contrast, the MagES field considered here, despite being at a greater distance from the LMC COM than most previous kinematic estimates, is still located well within the LMC dark halo: studies such as Navarrete et al (2019) or Munoz et al (2006) have found likely LMC-associated stars at distances almost three times greater than field 18. As such, the enclosed mass derived simply does not capture a significant fraction of the total LMC mass.…”
Section: Lmc Mass Estimatecontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This difference is to be expected, as each of the above methods provides the total infall mass of the LMC, including its dark halo. In contrast, the MagES field considered here, despite being at a greater distance from the LMC COM than most previous kinematic estimates, is still located well within the LMC dark halo: studies such as Navarrete et al (2019) or Munoz et al (2006) have found likely LMC-associated stars at distances almost three times greater than field 18. As such, the enclosed mass derived simply does not capture a significant fraction of the total LMC mass.…”
Section: Lmc Mass Estimatecontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…As such, the enclosed mass derived simply does not capture a significant fraction of the total LMC mass. If, however, the assumption is made that the LMC rotation curve remains flat out to 29kpc (the furthest distance LMC-associated stars have been found to date as per Navarrete et al 2019), and that the LMC is embedded in a typical dark matter halo, the inferred LMC enclosed mass would be (1.1±0.2)×10 11 M , which is more in line with total infall mass estimates, and the mass calculated under similar assumptions in Wan et al (2020). In this scenario, the implied M/L ratio of the LMC rises to 58.2±6.8 M /L .…”
Section: Lmc Mass Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This mass agrees with other estimations based on stellar dynamics, e.g., van der Marel & Kallivayalil (2014); van der Marel et al (2002). van der Marel & Kallivayalil (2014) estimated the tidal radius to be 22.3±5.2 kpc, whilst Navarrete et al (2019) found stars that match the expected velocity gradient for the LMC halo extending up to 29 kpc away from the LMC centre. If we assume that the circular velocity remains constant out to 30 kpc, the mass within tidal radius is (1.06±0.32)×10 11 M .…”
Section: Massmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We fit Sersic profiles to the Hα, Hγ and Hβ Balmer lines (see Navarrete et al 2019 eqn. 1), and the radial velocities are calculated by fitting all 3 lines simultaneously.…”
Section: Radial Velocities and A-type Star Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%