1986
DOI: 10.1086/163787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stellar spiral arms in smooth-armed galaxies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See Erwin & Sparke (2003). The break in the profile at ∼41 matches the outer pseudoring (studied by Kennicutt & Edgar 1986). Note that there is an additional, faint ring at larger radii, visible as a bump in the profile at r ∼ 70 .…”
Section: Note On Individual Galaxiessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…See Erwin & Sparke (2003). The break in the profile at ∼41 matches the outer pseudoring (studied by Kennicutt & Edgar 1986). Note that there is an additional, faint ring at larger radii, visible as a bump in the profile at r ∼ 70 .…”
Section: Note On Individual Galaxiessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Along the K-band arms in NGC 5248, there is good spatial coincidence between peaks in K-band emission and H ii regions as traced by Ha images. The patchy morphology of the K-band spirals is in stark contrast to the smooth appearance of old stellar arms (e.g., Kennicutt & Edgar 1986). Taken together, these properties suggest that young stars dominate the K-band spirals.…”
Section: Discussion: Implications For Barred Spirals Locally and At Hmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…There are two ways of estimating the contribution of young stars to the surface brightness enhancement in the spiral arms. First, because young stellar populations are both brighter and bluer than older ones, one can compare the arm/inter-arm color change to the arm/inter-arm brightness contrast (Schweizer, 1976;Jensen, Talbot and Dufour, 1981;Elmegreen and Elmegreen, 1984;Kennicutt and Edgar, 1986). These authors demonstrate that the color change across the spiral arm is too small to explain the brightness contrast merely through azimuthal mass-to-light ratio variations; consequently they argue for a substantial enhancement of the stellar surface mass density in the spiral arms of grand design spirals.…”
Section: Surface Brightness Vs Surface Mass Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%