2013
DOI: 10.1017/s1743921314002282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Stellar Prominences” on OB starsto explain wind-line variability

Abstract: Many O and B stars show unexplained cyclical variability in their winds, i.e. modulation of absorption features on the rotational timescale, but not strictly periodic over longer timescales. For these stars no dipolar magnetic fields have been detected, with upper limits below 300 G. Similar cyclical variability is also found in many optical lines, which are formed at the base of the wind. We propose that these cyclical variations are caused by the presence of multiple, transient, short-lived, corotating magne… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some quasicyclic behaviour with a typical timescale near 2 days, interpreted as half the rotation period, was found at some epochs (Henrichs & Sudnik 2014), the variations do not seem to be strictly (mono)periodic, but are reminiscent of the epoch-dependent variability found in other Oef stars (Rauw et al 2003; 2 . Henrichs & Sudnik (2014) accordingly suggest that the variations might arise from the presence of several transient short-lived magnetic loops corotating with the star. The localized magnetic fields responsible for these loops could take their origin in sub-surface convective layers of the star.…”
Section: Optical Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some quasicyclic behaviour with a typical timescale near 2 days, interpreted as half the rotation period, was found at some epochs (Henrichs & Sudnik 2014), the variations do not seem to be strictly (mono)periodic, but are reminiscent of the epoch-dependent variability found in other Oef stars (Rauw et al 2003; 2 . Henrichs & Sudnik (2014) accordingly suggest that the variations might arise from the presence of several transient short-lived magnetic loops corotating with the star. The localized magnetic fields responsible for these loops could take their origin in sub-surface convective layers of the star.…”
Section: Optical Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The variability of the star's emission lines has been subsequently studied by a number of authors (Lacy 1977;Leep & Conti 1979;Ebbets 1982;Grady et al 1983;McCandliss 1988;Henrichs et al 1988;Henrichs 1991;Kaper et al 1997Kaper et al , 1999Markova et al 2005). Although some quasicyclic behaviour with a typical timescale near 2 days, interpreted as half the rotation period, was found at some epochs (Henrichs & Sudnik 2014), the variations do not seem to be strictly (mono)periodic, but are reminiscent of the epoch-dependent variability found in other Oef stars (Rauw et al 2003; 2 . Henrichs & Sudnik (2014) accordingly suggest that the variations might arise from the presence of several transient short-lived magnetic loops corotating with the star.…”
Section: Optical Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the spectra according to Henrichs & Sudnik (2014) model where the line profile variability induced by the stellar prominences represented as a spheres touching the stellar surface. The prominence will give extra absorption or emission in the line profile depending on its location in the line of sight.…”
Section: Nrp and Rotational Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore consider the most simplified model to represent a "stellar prominence" by a sphere corotating and touching the surface. The model properties are described by Henrichs & Sudnik (2014). Essential in our procedure is that quotient spectra are fitted, such that the overal shape of the profile cancels out.…”
Section: Optical Wind-line Variability In the O6i(n)fp Star λ Cepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability is not periodic, but cyclic (like sunspots) with often a dominant quasi period which scales with the estimated rotation period (days to weeks), or perhaps an integer fraction thereof, see for instance references in Henrichs & Sudnik (2014), also for the remainder of this contribution. The cause or trigger is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%