1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-49169-9_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stellar Production of Lithium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With those generous yields, D'Antona & Matteucci (1991) concluded that AGB stars were indeed important lithium producers. For similar assumptions, Matteucci et al (1995) obtained the same result. The present models, full evolutionary computations, and not educated guesses, on the contrary suggest that the lithium yields of massive AGBs are not so important (VDM00, Romano et al 2001).…”
Section: Rediscussion Of the Galactic Chemical Evolution Of Lithiumsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…With those generous yields, D'Antona & Matteucci (1991) concluded that AGB stars were indeed important lithium producers. For similar assumptions, Matteucci et al (1995) obtained the same result. The present models, full evolutionary computations, and not educated guesses, on the contrary suggest that the lithium yields of massive AGBs are not so important (VDM00, Romano et al 2001).…”
Section: Rediscussion Of the Galactic Chemical Evolution Of Lithiumsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Other possibilities for production of Li, such as in AGB stars or carbon stars (Matteucci et al 1995, Romano 1999, are shown not to reproduce the observations really as well as the delayed models, as one can see, for example, in Figure 4.…”
Section: Discussion : Alternative Sources Of Disk Lithiummentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Graphs common to all panels : Model due to Prantzos et al (1993) (dashed plus dotted line). Model due to Matteucci et al (1995) ( solid line) ; model with no disk production but with linearly time-dependent stellar depletion from a M _ "" primordial ÏÏ value of log N(Li)^3.5 (long-and short-dashed lines).…”
Section: Analytical and Semianalytical Models For The Temporal Evolutmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our procedure is not self-consistent, we seek here the maximum possible contribution of the WW95 yields to the Li abundance, to see if they violate any observational constraint (see also Matteucci et al 1995); results can be easily scaled downwards and even down to zero contribution from CCSN; 4) stellar sources other than CCSN, that is low-mass RGs, AGB stars, and novae. The situation has not evolved much since the extensive discussions in Travaglio et al (2001) and Romano et al (2001), which clearly show that the uncertainties in all those Li sources make any quantitative calculation of Li evolution almost meaningless.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Stellar Component Of LImentioning
confidence: 99%