2005
DOI: 10.1086/432099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stellar Activity on the Young Suns of Orion: COUP Observations of K5‐7 Pre–Main‐Sequence Stars

Abstract: In January 2003, the Chandra Orion Ultradeep Project (COUP) detected about 1400 young stars during a 13.2 day observation of the Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC). This paper is a study of the X-ray properties of a well-defined sample of 28 solar-mass ONC stars based on COUP data. Our goals are to characterize

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
322
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(360 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
30
322
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The temporal behavior of COUP sources is often very complex, with high-amplitude, rapidly changing flares superposed on apparent quiescent or slowly variable emission as studied in detail by Wolk et al (2005), Favata et al (2005), and Flaccomio et al (2005). For the purpose of the present study, the individual features of the light curves are not of interest.…”
Section: The Coup Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The temporal behavior of COUP sources is often very complex, with high-amplitude, rapidly changing flares superposed on apparent quiescent or slowly variable emission as studied in detail by Wolk et al (2005), Favata et al (2005), and Flaccomio et al (2005). For the purpose of the present study, the individual features of the light curves are not of interest.…”
Section: The Coup Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strict and fully convincing definition for ''quiescent'' X-ray emission is not possible, especially since any apparently quiescent emission may, in reality, just be a superposition of numerous unresolved small flares. Wolk et al (2005) empirically establish a proxy for the quiescent emission levels by determining a ''characteristic level'' in each light curve, which is essentially defined as the average count rate over periods where the count rate is not significantly elevated. An estimate for the characteristic X-ray luminosity can then be obtained by multiplying the temporally averaged X-ray luminosity, as determined from the spectral analysis, with the ratio of the characteristic count rate from the MLB analysis to the mean count rate over the COUP exposure.…”
Section: The Coup Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No evidence of short term variability is found and the resulting probability weighted light curves are shown as black squares. We also applied a maximumlikelihood block algorithm that divides the event list into blocks of constant count rate (Wolk et al 2005). Each epoch is reproduced by a single block (grey bar), which also in- Count rate (ct s −1 ) 6.1 +0.6 −0.6 × 10 −3 8.7…”
Section: Timing Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its form for time-tagged data, this algorithm was used for example to characterize the X-ray light curves of young pre-main sequence stars observed by the Chandra Orion Ultra-Deep Project (COUP, Getman et al 2005) in the Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC). A modified version of the S98 algorithm, based on a Maximum Likelihood rather than a Bayesian approach, was recently employed in other studies of stellar X-ray light curves (Wolk et al 2005;Favata et al 2005;Stelzer et al 2006). We will refer to this algorithm as the Maximum Likelihood Blocks (MLBs) and we introduce here a variant that is suitable for the analysis of binned light curves.…”
Section: Representation Of the Light Curve: Maximum Likelihood Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes periods of no variable activity are defined in the literature as "quiescent". As discussed for example in (Wolk et al 2005), the meaning of quiescent emission is ambiguous. An apparently quiescent level can be due to a superposition of numerous unresolved flares.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Light Curve: Flares Versus Characterismentioning
confidence: 99%