2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0255-1_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SteinLib: An Updated Library on Steiner Tree Problems in Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Min Steiner Tree, we consider five data sets taken from the SteinLib [KMV01], namely B, C, D, I640, and PUC. Cut coordination is achieved by considering the cut diversity w.r.t.…”
Section: Pure Cutting Plane Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Min Steiner Tree, we consider five data sets taken from the SteinLib [KMV01], namely B, C, D, I640, and PUC. Cut coordination is achieved by considering the cut diversity w.r.t.…”
Section: Pure Cutting Plane Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two major benchmark libraries for the Steiner problem in networks: the collection in the ORLibrary [2] and SteinLib [15]. We have chosen the group with the largest instances (2500 vertices) from the OR-Library and a group of VLSI-instances (up to 6836 vertices) from SteinLib for the comparisons in this paper.…”
Section: Appendix 1: Empirical Results On Benchmark Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated the performance of our proposed method using the test sets provided in SteinLib [13]. The results of the numerical simulations indicate that the proposed method achieves a stable performance compared with the conventional KMB algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, we set α to 30% of the maximum edge cost for each network in these simulations. Tables 1, 2, and 3 present the error rates obtained by the conventional KMB algorithm and the proposed method for the test sets B, C, and D in SteinLib [13]. It is seen from these tables that the proposed method achieved a better performance than the conventional KMB algorithm in the maximum and median values.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation