1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01588324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steiner's problem and fagnano's result on the sphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm is complete (see figure for example). Another observation relevant to our discussion of the Steiner problem on the regular tetrahedron is that no geodesic passes through the vertices of a narrow cone [Lee et al 2011]. Since a small neighborhood of a vertex is a narrow cone, no shortest path network will pass through any vertices of -.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The algorithm is complete (see figure for example). Another observation relevant to our discussion of the Steiner problem on the regular tetrahedron is that no geodesic passes through the vertices of a narrow cone [Lee et al 2011]. Since a small neighborhood of a vertex is a narrow cone, no shortest path network will pass through any vertices of -.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms exist to find the solution for the Steiner problem on certain surfaces of constant curvature. The problem was studied in [Weng 2001;Litwhiler and Aly 1980;Brazil et al 1998] for on curved surfaces, including spheres. March and Halverson [2005] studied Steiner trees in hyperbolic space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [14], Fagnano's result was obtained for four points on a same hemisphere, by way of an analytical reasoning. Lemma 2 allows to obtain a much more complete answer on the sphere, as follows.…”
Section: Sphere Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stereographic projection arguments used in [14] may quite easily be extended to prove the following absorbed case result on the sphere (one may wonder why this case was not considered there, but only the floating case, which may be solved more completely using much simpler means).…”
Section: Sphere Distancementioning
confidence: 99%