2022
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2021.3137503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stein ICP for Uncertainty Estimation in Point Cloud Matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it encounters challenges when dealing with complex geometries featuring low overlap or significant displacements, primarily due to the difficulty in finding reasonable correspondences via closest point search. Consequently, numerous ICP variants have been proposed to address these issues, including various designs concerning correspondence matching [17,18], objective functions [11,19], and robust kernels [20]. In the context of our system's rigid registration thread, we leverage geometric features such as normals and curvatures to enhance correspondence matching, as demonstrated in prior work [11].…”
Section: Rigid Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it encounters challenges when dealing with complex geometries featuring low overlap or significant displacements, primarily due to the difficulty in finding reasonable correspondences via closest point search. Consequently, numerous ICP variants have been proposed to address these issues, including various designs concerning correspondence matching [17,18], objective functions [11,19], and robust kernels [20]. In the context of our system's rigid registration thread, we leverage geometric features such as normals and curvatures to enhance correspondence matching, as demonstrated in prior work [11].…”
Section: Rigid Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to photograph the point cloud at the missing corner and extract local features for matching calculation. Figure 4(d-f) show the iterative closest point (ICP) [9] matching effect of the corresponding local feature point cloud, both of which have better matching effect. Figure 4(g-i) show the point cloud matching effect obtained by point pair feature (PPF) [10][11] method.…”
Section: Point Cloud Matching Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the algorithm has a low accuracy of the pose estimation when the uncertainty of the prior estimation of the system is high, and the numerical stability is not high. The pose calibration method can also utilize the point cloud registration algorithm of LiDAR, and the commonly used algorithm is the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm [8], which can accurately find the conversion relationship between two radar scans. However, when the sample size of the point set is too large, the ICP algorithm will waste computational resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%