Steering, Supporting, Enabling: The Role of Law in Local Government Reforms

Abstract

Reforms in local government often follow decisions that are taken by central governments. To initiate these changes, law is the most important mechanism. This article analyzes the different regulative strategies legislators can apply in this context. Since local governments have a variety of options at hand to resist orders for change, a strict steering approach is not necessarily the most promising mechanism. Contrariwise, to play a purely enabling role might not be a satisfactory option for central governments that want to express their commitment to a multilevel reform agenda.

Digitalisation and Law: The More Things Change – the More They Stay the Same

“…Taking into account that public administration is a cross-disciplinary determined fieldboth in scientific research and in its practising public governance at the instrumental level -, special attention was dedicated in our analysis to the multidisciplinarity. Namely, there are theoretical findings of the inevitable PA's inter-and multidisciplinary approach due to the complex social issues to address in PA in general (Bouckaert & Jann, 2020; Raadschelders, 2011) and related legal branches in particular (Mehde, 2006). Contrary, the reality is often different and public policies and legal rules might be inefficient.…”

Territorial government reforms at the time of financial crisis: the dawn of metropolitan cities in Italy

“…So, the institutional role of metropolitan cities depends both on the powers they exercise and on the boundaries they have in the exercise of these powers. Although the legislative power is vested in the state and regional levels, implementation has to be pursued primarily at the local level (Mehde, 2006). The dawn of metropolitan cities is clearly an example of a state-centric approach in the reform of intermediate levels of government.…”