2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.98.012305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steering a single system sequentially by multiple observers

Abstract: Quantum mechanics puts a restriction on the number of observers who can simultaneously steer another observer's system, known as the monogamy of steering. In this work we find the limit of the number of observers (Bobs) who can steer another party's (Alice's) system invoking a scenario where half of an entangled pair is shared between a single Alice in one wing and several Bobs on the other wing, who act sequentially and independently of each other. When all the observers measure two dichotomic observables, we… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
100
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that it was conjectured in Ref. [19] that N Bobs can exhibit steering with respect to Alice when steering is probed through an N -settings steering inequality, in the case d = 2. From our results, which are admittedly restricted to the maximally entangled state together with specific measurements, it seems that this conjecture is not true.…”
Section: A All Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that it was conjectured in Ref. [19] that N Bobs can exhibit steering with respect to Alice when steering is probed through an N -settings steering inequality, in the case d = 2. From our results, which are admittedly restricted to the maximally entangled state together with specific measurements, it seems that this conjecture is not true.…”
Section: A All Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This motivated further work exploring the potential of these ideas for randomness generation [13] and their classical communication cost [14], and led to experimental demonstrations [15,16]. More recently, these ideas were extended to other types of quantum correlations [17][18][19]. Specifically, Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in order to address the aforementioned problem with n Charlies, the measurements of the first (n − 1) Charlies should be weak. In the present study we will follow the unsharp version of the weak measurement formalism discussed in [12,18]. For completeness we briefly recapitulate in the following the weak measurement scheme introduced in [11] and then unsharp version of that considered in [12,18].…”
Section: Setting Up the Scenario Via Weak Measurement Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when +1 and −1 outcomes are obtained, respectively. The quality factor F and the precision G defined in the context of aforementioned weak measurement formalism are related to the unsharp measurement formalism through F = √ 1 − λ 2 and G = λ [12,18]. Hence, it is evident that the sharpness parameter λ characterizes the precision of the measurement.…”
Section: Setting Up the Scenario Via Weak Measurement Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation