The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2020.2988139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steerable ePCA: Rotationally Invariant Exponential Family PCA

Abstract: In photon-limited imaging, the pixel intensities are affected by photon count noise. Many applications, such as 3-D reconstruction using correlation analysis in X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) single molecule imaging, require an accurate estimation of the covariance of the underlying 2-D clean images. Accurate estimation of the covariance from low-photon count images must take into account that pixel intensities are Poisson distributed, rendering the sub-optimality of the classical sample covariance estimator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this paper has focused on theoretical and algorithmic development, in future work we plan to apply the methods to problems where related but suboptimal methods have previously been employed. This includes the problems of denoising and deconvolution of images from cryoelectron microscopy [8], three-dimensional reconstruction of heterogeneous molecules from noisy images [1], and denoising XFEL images [41,56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this paper has focused on theoretical and algorithmic development, in future work we plan to apply the methods to problems where related but suboptimal methods have previously been employed. This includes the problems of denoising and deconvolution of images from cryoelectron microscopy [8], three-dimensional reconstruction of heterogeneous molecules from noisy images [1], and denoising XFEL images [41,56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%