2001
DOI: 10.1126/science.1065100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steep-Dip Seismic Imaging of the Shallow San Andreas Fault Near Parkfield

Abstract: Seismic reflection and refraction images illuminate the San Andreas Fault to a depth of 1 kilometer. The prestack depth-migrated reflection image contains near-vertical reflections aligned with the active fault trace. The fault is vertical in the upper 0.5 kilometer, then dips about 70 degrees to the southwest to at least 1 kilometer subsurface. This dip reconciles the difference between the computed locations of earthquakes and the surface fault trace. The seismic velocity cross section shows strong lateral v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct reflection imaging of steep faults is rare, with only a few examples in California (e.g., Shaw and Shearer, 1999;Hole et al, 2001;Bleibinhaus et al, 2007). The imaging method of Bauer et al (2013) represents a promising tool that can be applied to steep faults worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct reflection imaging of steep faults is rare, with only a few examples in California (e.g., Shaw and Shearer, 1999;Hole et al, 2001;Bleibinhaus et al, 2007). The imaging method of Bauer et al (2013) represents a promising tool that can be applied to steep faults worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A schematic plot of a typical fault zone, after Chester and Logan (1986) Pinto Mountain faults, Southern California (Fialko et al 2002). In addition, many geophysical methods have been applied in deriving FZ properties such as gravity and electromagnetic surveys, seismic reflection and refraction, travel-time tomography, earthquake location, waveform modeling of FZ-reflected body waves, FZ head waves, and FZ trapped waves (e.g., Mooney and Ginzburg 1986;BenZion and Malin 1991;Ben-Zion et al 1992;Hole et al 2001;Prejean et al 2002;Waldhauser and Ellsworth 2002;Li et al 2002;McGuire and Ben-Zion 2005;Bleibinhaus et al 2007;Li et al 2007;Yang et al 2009;Roland et al 2012). In the following, I briefly review a few seismological and geodetic methods that have been used to derive FZ structure.…”
Section: Fz Properties and Their Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They most likely represent reflections at steeply dipping or near vertical structures in the center of the profiles (i.e. the main fault) and/or parts of diffraction hyperbolas related to strong point scatterers directly at the fault (see for example Hole et al, 2001). In the migration process ( Figure 8) these reflective events collapse into subvertical structures or single points.…”
Section: A C C E P T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%