2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steam reforming of acetic acid over nickel-based catalysts: The intrinsic effects of nickel precursors on behaviors of nickel catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect was particularly severe in catalysts with nickel chloride as a precursor; its reduction peak at around 500 C clearly shows that NiAl 2 O 4 formed and combined strongly with support material, making it difficult to be reduced and thereby limiting the catalytic effect of the nickel species. [40]…”
Section: H 2 Tpr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect was particularly severe in catalysts with nickel chloride as a precursor; its reduction peak at around 500 C clearly shows that NiAl 2 O 4 formed and combined strongly with support material, making it difficult to be reduced and thereby limiting the catalytic effect of the nickel species. [40]…”
Section: H 2 Tpr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 3 (a) and (b), all the catalysts exhibited the IV-type Langmuir adsorption isotherm, which was assigned to the mesoporous structures [35][36][37] . The height of the hysteresis loop decreased with increasing the barium loading, corresponding to the decreased specific surface area of the Ni-based catalyst.…”
Section: Specific Surface Areamentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These results indicated that the nitrate and chloride salts were good precursors than sulfate based on activity consideration. However, chloride precursor is unfavorable environmentally because of a persistent organics emission source, therefore it was assumed that nickel nitrate was the best candidate for methanation catalyst precursor [22][23][24]. According to the characterization results of fresh catalysts ( Table 1, and Figure 1), no significant differences were observed for the properties of three fresh catalysts.…”
Section: со Conversionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, the catalysts contained similar amounts of nickel metal species, and their surface areas were almost same. Though the catalysts were prepared using the same method of impregnation-co-precipitation, the only catalytic performance of Ni/Al (S) was very low [24]. In order to examine a possible residual sulfur effect on catalytic activity, total sulfur of fresh catalysts were determined.…”
Section: со Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%