2012
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.2941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stealthy annotation of experimental biology by spreadsheets

Abstract: SUMMARYThe increase in volume and complexity of biological data has led to increased requirements to reuse that data. Consistent and accurate metadata is essential for this task, creating new challenges in semantic data annotation and in the constriction of terminologies and ontologies used for annotation. The BioSharing community are developing standards and terminologies for annotation, which have been adopted across bioinformatics, but the real challenge is to make these standards accessible to laboratory s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wolstencroft et al . describe new methods for building a better bridge between the semantic data annotation and the laboratory scientist. Using unobtrusive ‘stealthy’ methods for collecting standards compliant, semantically annotated data, and for contributing ontologies used for those annotations, the authors have built upon the ubiquitous spreadsheet to enable scientist to structure information and select ontology terms without changing common workplace practices.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wolstencroft et al . describe new methods for building a better bridge between the semantic data annotation and the laboratory scientist. Using unobtrusive ‘stealthy’ methods for collecting standards compliant, semantically annotated data, and for contributing ontologies used for those annotations, the authors have built upon the ubiquitous spreadsheet to enable scientist to structure information and select ontology terms without changing common workplace practices.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated with this interdisciplinary movement is the need for tools that support reusability and supplement the current understanding of genetic sequences. To satisfy this need, synthetic biology communities across the world have developed tools and ontologies to help describe their unique semantic annotations. Shared representations for data and metadata, grounded in well-defined ontology terms, can help reduce confusion when researchers share materials . The Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) has been developed to address this challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2−15 Shared representations for data and metadata, grounded in well-defined ontology terms, can help reduce confusion when researchers share materials. 16 The Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) 6 has been developed to address this challenge. SBOL provides a standardized format for the electronic exchange of information on the structural and functional aspects of biological designs, supporting the use of engineering principles such as abstraction, modularity, and standardization for synthetic biology.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Shared representations for data and metadata, grounded in well-defined ontology terms, can help reduce confusion when sharing materials between researchers. 16 The Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) 6 has been developed to address this challenge. SBOL provides a standardized format for the electronic exchange of information on the structural and functional aspects of biological designs, supporting the use of engineering principles such as abstraction, modularity, and standardization for synthetic biology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%