The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.119.010501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady States of Infinite-Size Dissipative Quantum Chains via Imaginary Time Evolution

Abstract: Directly in the thermodynamic limit, we show how to combine local imaginary and real-time evolution of tensor networks to efficiently and accurately find the nonequilibrium steady states (NESSs) of one-dimensional dissipative quantum lattices governed by a local Lindblad master equation. The imaginary time evolution first bypasses any highly correlated portions of the real-time evolution trajectory by directly converging to the weakly correlated subspace of the NESS, after which, real-time evolution completes … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, since the universality class of the QCP is currently debated, [7,9,11], it is of considerable interest in its own right to make estimates of critical exponents, comparing these with previous estimates and known cases.To simulate the non-equilibrium dynamics of the QCP, we apply matrix product states (MPSs) and the timeevolving block-decimation (TEBD) algorithm [13][14][15]. This algorithm belongs to a more general class of tensor network (TN) methods, well established for the simulation of closed quantum systems in 1d, which have also been applied to dissipative quantum systems previously in a number of cases [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In the context of studying dissipative quantum dynamics, a key question for TN methods is whether different approaches, such as quantum trajectories (QTs) as opposed to the Lindblad master equation, can lead to substantially different accuracies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since the universality class of the QCP is currently debated, [7,9,11], it is of considerable interest in its own right to make estimates of critical exponents, comparing these with previous estimates and known cases.To simulate the non-equilibrium dynamics of the QCP, we apply matrix product states (MPSs) and the timeevolving block-decimation (TEBD) algorithm [13][14][15]. This algorithm belongs to a more general class of tensor network (TN) methods, well established for the simulation of closed quantum systems in 1d, which have also been applied to dissipative quantum systems previously in a number of cases [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In the context of studying dissipative quantum dynamics, a key question for TN methods is whether different approaches, such as quantum trajectories (QTs) as opposed to the Lindblad master equation, can lead to substantially different accuracies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A TN operator is regarded as a mapping from the bra to the ket Hilbert space. Many algorithms explicitly employ the TN operator form, including the matrix product operator (MPO) for representing 1D many-body operators and mixed states, and for simulating 1D systems in and out of equilibrium [186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196], tensor product operator (also called projected entangled pair operators) in for higher-systems [140,141,143,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206], and multiscale entangled renormalization ansatz [207,208,209].…”
Section: Tensor Network States In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPS or PEPS can be readily generalized from representations of states to those of operators called MPO [186,187,188,189,193,194,195,196] or projected entangled pair operator (PEPO) 7 [140,141,143,197,198,199,201,202,203,204]. Let us begin with MPO, which is also formed by the contraction of local tensors aŝ…”
Section: Tensor Network Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the steady-state solutions in the thermodynamic limit have been proven to be remarkably difficult, some approximations are imposed to the density matrix, such as the single-site and cluster Gutzwiller mean-field factorizations [12,18,16,[32][33][34], to unravel the many-body master equation. Besides, numerical methods based on tensor networks [35][36][37][38], corner space renormalization [39], variational principal [17,40,41], and the neural networks [42][43][44][45] have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%