1998
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.58.3557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady states and global dynamics of electrical activity in the cerebral cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unless otherwise noted, we use the parameter values as listed in Appendix for numerical simulations. These values result from physiological experiments, and can be found in previous studies (Breakspear et al 2006;Chen et al 2014;Robinson et al 1998Robinson et al , 2001Robinson et al , 2003. At the same time, some parameter values are slightly adjusted to generate stable SWDs oscillation in corticothalamic circuit.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Unless otherwise noted, we use the parameter values as listed in Appendix for numerical simulations. These values result from physiological experiments, and can be found in previous studies (Breakspear et al 2006;Chen et al 2014;Robinson et al 1998Robinson et al , 2001Robinson et al , 2003. At the same time, some parameter values are slightly adjusted to generate stable SWDs oscillation in corticothalamic circuit.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…They showed that the frequency content, wave velocities, frequency spectra, and responses to cortical activation of the ECoG can be reproduced by a "lumped" simulation treating small cortical areas as a single function unit. Describing the overall activity, Robinson et al (1997Robinson et al ( , 1998Robinson et al ( , 2002 developed a model based on the model of Wright and Liley. They argued that the isolated cortex is relatively stable, leading to strongly damped waves and minimal influence of boundary conditions.…”
Section: J Neurophysiolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, and threshold J i ; they fit the static nonlinearity of real neurons for p i in roughly the range 0.5 … 3.0 (Anderson et al 2001;Heeger 1992) but may also be seen as a polynomial approximation of sigmoid rate-functions employed by others in the most relevant regime of low and intermediate activity (Amari 1977;Haken 1996, 1997;Rennie et al 1999;Robinson et al 1997Robinson et al , 1998Taylor 1999;Cowan 1972, 1973). Note that all potentials are measured against a resting potential of zero without loss of generality: Any non-zero resting potential would appear in (1) as a constant offset on the right hand side, say, þ/ bg i : A linear transformation / i ðx; tÞ ¼ / i ðx; tÞ À / bg i would move these offsets into the arguments of the rate-functions where they could be integrated into the firing thresholds leaving us with the form (1) again, this time for the transformed potentials (the ''firing thresholds'', so-to-speak, measure the relative distance between the ''true'' resting potential and the ''true'' threshold).…”
Section: Neural Field Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These models take the form of partial differential equations comprising diffusively coupled local nonlinear oscillators. They are useful to explain properties of experimental EEG data like its frequency spectrum, wave propagation, and selforganising excitation patterns (Ingber 1994;Haken 1996, 1997;Rennie et al 1999;Robinson et al 1997Robinson et al , 1998Hutt et al 2003;Wright et al 2003;Robinson and Rennie 2006;Coombes et al 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation