2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00226-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady-state visual evoked potentials reveal frontally-mediated working memory activity in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ssmfVEP may be useful for objective perimetry because spectral analyses can be used for automated evaluation of the responses. The steady-state measurements are possibly shorter for similar SNRs than conventional mfVEPs because the whole recording period is used for analysis, whereas in transient measurements, separate intervals for registration of signal response and noise are needed and because eye movements and electromyographic artefacts may be less disturbing in the analysis of ssmfVEP recordings [40,41]. Furthermore, flickering targets in psychophysical perimetric tests are known to be superior to flashing stimuli in diagnosing certain diseases such as glaucoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ssmfVEP may be useful for objective perimetry because spectral analyses can be used for automated evaluation of the responses. The steady-state measurements are possibly shorter for similar SNRs than conventional mfVEPs because the whole recording period is used for analysis, whereas in transient measurements, separate intervals for registration of signal response and noise are needed and because eye movements and electromyographic artefacts may be less disturbing in the analysis of ssmfVEP recordings [40,41]. Furthermore, flickering targets in psychophysical perimetric tests are known to be superior to flashing stimuli in diagnosing certain diseases such as glaucoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tapping into this knowledge, researchers have built BCIs that use stimuli at different frequencies to represent a set of responses from which the user selects one by paying attention to it. Such BCIs are particularly attractive because occipital SSVEPs have high signal-to-noise ratios and are nearly completely free of eye movement [91] and electromyographic (EMG) artifacts [92,93]. Moreover, SSVEP-based BCIs allow the user to select from a relatively large number [up to 64 of different choices 15,94] without adversely affecting classification accuracy, which tends to range between 64-96.5% [88].…”
Section: Ssvep-based Bcismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the subject focuses his attention on the stimulus, EEG activity is detected at the corresponding frequency over occipital areas [7]. The SSVEP-based BCI has many advantages over other EEG-based BCI systems, including (i) a high signal-tonoise ratio , (ii) a high information transfer rate [8], (iii) less susceptibility to eye movements and blink artifacts [9] as well as to electromyographic artifacts [10], and (iv) they require very little training since the SSVEP is an inherent response of the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%