2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-020-00508-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady-State Large-Eddy Simulations of Convective and Stable Urban Boundary Layers

Abstract: A comprehensive investigation is carried out to establish best practice guidelines for the modelling of statistically steady-state non-neutral urban boundary layers (UBL) using largeeddy simulation (LES). These steady-state simulations enable targeted studies under realistic non-neutral conditions without the complications associated with the inherently transient nature of the UBL. An extensive set of simulations of convective and stable conditions is carried out to determine which simplifications, volumetric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2b, c. We also attribute the smaller u values above the UCL in CCR06 and CDT07 to the reduced amount of resolved TKE, which decreases with decreasing ratios of H i ∕H (Grylls et al 2020). Our simulated vertical profiles of these quantities do eventually decrease with height, as would be expected, for z∕H > 5 (not shown).…”
Section: Comparison With Published Datasupporting
confidence: 63%
“…2b, c. We also attribute the smaller u values above the UCL in CCR06 and CDT07 to the reduced amount of resolved TKE, which decreases with decreasing ratios of H i ∕H (Grylls et al 2020). Our simulated vertical profiles of these quantities do eventually decrease with height, as would be expected, for z∕H > 5 (not shown).…”
Section: Comparison With Published Datasupporting
confidence: 63%
“…If the parameters F u and u are scaled vertically by ( H i − H ) rather than H (not shown), the shapes of the vertical profiles above the UCL differ less than in Fig. 2b, c. We also attribute the smaller u values above the UCL in CCR06 and CDT07 to the reduced amount of resolved TKE, which decreases with decreasing ratios of H i ∕H (Grylls et al 2020). Our simulated vertical profiles of these quantities do eventually decrease with height, as would be expected, for z∕H > 5 (not shown).…”
Section: Comparison With Published Datamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…They found energetically predominant structures throughout the entire boundary layer, probably driving the flow dynamics, but this information was insufficient to identify the leading mechanism, i.e., whether it was associated to the inner or the outer layer. Finally, Crylls et al [96] introduced a new method using a LES approach (with periodic boundary conditions) to model the statistically-steady state of non-neutral urban boundary layers. This method freezes transient simulations into a steady state, showing a good performance in both stable and convective conditions.…”
Section: Numerical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%