2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.91.012806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady state and mean recurrence time for random walks on stochastic temporal networks

Abstract: Random walks are basic diffusion processes on networks and have applications in, for example, searching, navigation, ranking, and community detection. Recent recognition of the importance of temporal aspects on networks spurred studies of random walks on temporal networks. Here we theoretically study two types of event-driven random walks on a stochastic temporal network model that produces arbitrary distributions of interevent times. In the so-called active random walk, the interevent time is reinitialized on… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, in the large time regime, the walker behaves as in a completely homogeneous network, in which jumps were performed independently of the node activity. This result recovers the observation made in [30,45]. In order to check the validity of the time dependence expressed in equation (58), we have performed numerical simulations of the activated random walk on a NoPAD network of size N=10 5 where the activity takes three values, c=0.1,1 or 10, each with probability η(c)=1/3.…”
Section: Non-poissonian Activity-driven Network With Infinite Averagsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, in the large time regime, the walker behaves as in a completely homogeneous network, in which jumps were performed independently of the node activity. This result recovers the observation made in [30,45]. In order to check the validity of the time dependence expressed in equation (58), we have performed numerical simulations of the activated random walk on a NoPAD network of size N=10 5 where the activity takes three values, c=0.1,1 or 10, each with probability η(c)=1/3.…”
Section: Non-poissonian Activity-driven Network With Infinite Averagsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A way to neglect these aging effects is by considering active random walks, in which the inter-event time of a node is reinitialized when a walker lands on it, in such a way that intervent and waiting time distributions coincide. In opposition, in passive random walks the presence of the walker does not reinitialize the inter-event times of nodes or edges, and thus the waiting time depends on the last activation time [45]. The non-Poissoinan scenario has been considered in the general context of a fixed network in which edges are established according to a given inter-event time distribution ψ ij (t) for active walkers [45][46][47] and for passive walkers [45], usually with the assumption of a finite average inter-event time distribution, with the exception of [47].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the taxonomy of RWs on networks, this corresponds to the popular edge-centric passive RW [1]. In particular, we explore in detail the implications of an apparently paradoxical situation [17,18]: despite the fact that edges are independent processes, they cease to be independent along the path of a walker when the inter-event time distribution is non-exponential, which may lead to biases in its dynamics and non-Markovian trajectories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question has been considered by means of numerical simulations, by simulating a diffusive process on empirical temporal network data [14], and comparing its speed with the same process run on randomized null models [15]. A theoretical approach, which we also adopt here, consists in neglecting correlations between activations of different edges, and modelling their dynamics as independent renewal processes [16,17]. In the taxonomy of RWs on networks, this corresponds to the popular edge-centric passive RW [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pre-determined temporal network structure, such as empirical contact lists with time stamps, temporal greedy walks are entirely deterministic once the initial conditions (first node, time) have been set, as long as nodes only participate in a single event at a time, which is mainly the case with our empirical data. Note that in some temporal-network models of random walks [18][19][20], the walks themselves are in fact temporally greedy, and randomness only comes from a stochastic model of the underlying temporal network. Further, in studies of random walks on temporal networks the focus has mainly been on issues such as effects of burstiness on mean first passage and relaxation times [15,17], models that generate temporal networks [21], and identification of timescales [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%