2000
DOI: 10.1109/41.857959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady-state analysis of an interleaved boost converter with coupled inductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 422 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional boost converter has a simple circuit and low cost [8]. The disadvantages of conventional boost converter are high ripple current on active and passive components, large voltage stress for power switches, and require a large capacitor value to keep the output voltage steady [9]. This difficulty can be solved by using interleaved boost converter which is another power boost converter circuit [10].…”
Section: Conventional Boost Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional boost converter has a simple circuit and low cost [8]. The disadvantages of conventional boost converter are high ripple current on active and passive components, large voltage stress for power switches, and require a large capacitor value to keep the output voltage steady [9]. This difficulty can be solved by using interleaved boost converter which is another power boost converter circuit [10].…”
Section: Conventional Boost Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the drawback of this converter is that the voltage across the switch is very high during the resonance mode components [8]. Lee et al [9] described the optimal design of the resonant components and the interleaved method is proposed for resonant current reduction. That the interleaved method distributes the input current to each phase, the current rating of the switching devices can be decreased by using interleaved method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the degree of ripple cancellation is also varying parameter. The most optimum cancellation of ripple is a function of the duty cycle of the converter and the number of phases [6]. A method of measuring the variation of the ripple cancellation as duty cycle is varied is by using the factor Fc as shown in figure [7], [8].…”
Section: A Interleavingmentioning
confidence: 99%