1982
DOI: 10.1115/1.3245104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady Conduction in Three-Dimensional Shells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 compares the predictions of the integral and two-rule models with numerical data from Warrington et al 2 The ratio of the diameter of the spherical enclosure and the cube side length, d o /s i , is also plotted vs V 1/3 / √ A i on the second y axis. There is good agreement between both models and the data; however, the integral model provides a better fit of the data than the two-rule model, within 3% rms difference over the full range of the dimensionless gap spacing.…”
Section: Cube In Spherical Enclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 5 compares the predictions of the integral and two-rule models with numerical data from Warrington et al 2 The ratio of the diameter of the spherical enclosure and the cube side length, d o /s i , is also plotted vs V 1/3 / √ A i on the second y axis. There is good agreement between both models and the data; however, the integral model provides a better fit of the data than the two-rule model, within 3% rms difference over the full range of the dimensionless gap spacing.…”
Section: Cube In Spherical Enclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(35) Figure 6 compares the S √ A i data of Warrington et al 2 with both the two-rule and integral models, as well as the ratio…”
Section: Sphere In Cubical Enclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hassani 1 presents data for the concentric circular cylinders and the concentric base-attached cones for a wide range of gap spacing. Warrington et al 2 presents numerical data for enclosures formed between different concentric boundary shapes for two cases: the cube in a spherical enclosure and the sphere in a cubical enclosure.…”
Section: Aiaa-2003-0159mentioning
confidence: 99%