“Stay Tuned”: Inter-Individual Neural Synchronization During Mutual Gaze and Joint Attention

Abstract

Eye contact provides a communicative link between humans, prompting joint attention. As spontaneous brain activity might have an important role in the coordination of neuronal processing within the brain, their inter-subject synchronization might occur during eye contact. To test this, we conducted simultaneous functional MRI in pairs of adults. Eye contact was maintained at baseline while the subjects engaged in real-time gaze exchange in a joint attention task. Averted gaze activated the bilateral occipital pole extending to the right posterior superior temporal sulcus, the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex, and the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus. Following a partner's gaze toward an object activated the left intraparietal sulcus. After all the task-related effects were modeled out, inter-individual correlation analysis of residual time-courses was performed. Paired subjects showed more prominent correlations than non-paired subjects in the right inferior frontal gyrus, suggesting that this region is involved in sharing intention during eye contact that provides the context for joint attention.

Functional changes of the reward system underlie blunted response to social gaze in cocaine users

“…Corroborating previous findings of studies investigating JA and social cognition (25,38), we initially demonstrated that self-initiated JA vs. NJA recruited several reward-related areas (mPFC, mOFC, and PCC) in our control participants. These areas have repeatedly been shown to be associated with social cognition (39).…”

A NIRS–fMRI study of resting state network

“…Furthermore, both an activation in part of the fronto-parietal control network and a deactivation in the default mode network have been observed when participants were imitated, compared with when they imitated others (Guionnet et al, 2012). However, there are only a handful of studies that explore neural mechanisms of social interaction in an interactive context (Guionnet et al, 2012;Redcay et al, 2010;Saito et al, 2010;Schilbach et al, 2010;Tognoli et al, 2007), though social interaction is a coregulated coupling activity that involves at least two autonomous agents. As Guionnet et al has pointed out, the major reason for this paucity may be attributed to the methodological and technical difficulties associated with creating a natural social interaction within an MRI environment.…”

Frontal alpha oscillations distinguish leaders from followers: Multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains

“…One group of such studies has employed pseudo-interactive scenarios, scanning one person at a time in unidirectional interactions (Schippers et al, 2010, Stephens et al, 2010, Anders et al, 2011, Kuhlen et al, 2012, while others have measured two-brain processes during either turn-based or continuous, mutual interactions, employing fMRI (e.g. Montague et al, 2002, KingCasas et al, 2005, Saito et al, 2010, EEG (e.g. Lindenberger et al, 2009, Dumas et al, 2010, Dodel et al, 2011, Yun et al, 2012, or fNIRS (e.g.…”