2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3835(02)00101-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staurosporine-induced G 1 arrest in cancer cells depends on an intact pRB but is independent of p16 status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protection observed was in a p53-independent and pRb-dependent manner (2). Other labs have similarly revealed the importance of pRb in the staurosporine-mediated G 1 arrest process (3,(10)(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The protection observed was in a p53-independent and pRb-dependent manner (2). Other labs have similarly revealed the importance of pRb in the staurosporine-mediated G 1 arrest process (3,(10)(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Of interest, we found that the protection observed was in a p53-independent and pRb-dependent manner. Other labs have similarly shown that the ability of staurosporine to mediate inhibition of cell proliferation is dependent on an intact pRb pathway (3,(10)(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with our observation, a number of studies have associated the inhibition of CDKs to cell cycle arrest 52 , 53 . Zhou et al reported that treatment of human breast cancer cells with staurosporine causes a reduction in the expression level of CDK that accompanies a G1 cell cycle arrest 54 , while Ishida et al reported that treatment of breast cancer cell lines with herbimycin A caused cell cycle arrest-related reduction of the CDK4 and CDK6 expression levels 55 . In another study, it was reported that treatment of MCF-7 breast cancer cell line with 1,25(OH)2D3 induces cell cycle arrest at G0/G1phase via inhibition of CDK2 and CDK4 56 - 60 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dephosporylation of Rb in SF-539 cells and our previous findings of Rb dephosphorylation in U251MG cells after staurosporine exposure indicated that Rb could be a target of staurosporine. Indeed, others have also reported that staurosporine cannot cause cells without Rb to accumulate at the G1 phase [9,50] . However, the decrease in phosphorylated Rb after staurosporine exposure did not affect the cycle of Ax-Rbtransfected SF-539 cells under our conditions, probably because the amount of dephosphorylated Rb that originally predominated in the Ax-Rb-transfected SF-539 cells was sufficient to cause G1 arrest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of MTT assays showed that nontransfected and all Ax-mock-transfected cells were simi-larly viable and that the viability of U251MG and D54MG cells transfected with these genes and exposed to staurosporine was not obviously changed (data not shown). However, SF-539 cells transfected with Ax-Rb became resistant to staurosporine after 5 days (IC 50 …”
Section: Rb Expression Status Relative To Staurosporine Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%