1993
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status signalling, motivational condition and dominance: an experimental study in the great tit, Parus major L.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This definition is consistent with much of the previous research because dominance has traditionally been associated with fighting ability (Packer and Pusey 1985;Chapais 1991;Pierotti et al 1997). The close relationship between dominance and fighting ability accounts for the fact that dominance is often correlated with body size (Dugatkin and Ohlsen 1990;Lemel and Wallin 1993;Piper 1997). Also note that dominance does not require the use of force but can also be based upon the potential to use force, for even the infrequent use of force can be very effective (Chapais 1992).…”
Section: Dominance and Leveragesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This definition is consistent with much of the previous research because dominance has traditionally been associated with fighting ability (Packer and Pusey 1985;Chapais 1991;Pierotti et al 1997). The close relationship between dominance and fighting ability accounts for the fact that dominance is often correlated with body size (Dugatkin and Ohlsen 1990;Lemel and Wallin 1993;Piper 1997). Also note that dominance does not require the use of force but can also be based upon the potential to use force, for even the infrequent use of force can be very effective (Chapais 1992).…”
Section: Dominance and Leveragesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Drews 1993). This problem has only been magnified with researchers using different methods for applying the concept of dominance to empirical studies (e.g., direction of aggression: Vestergaard et al 1993; priority of access: Lemel and Wallin 1993; direction of aggression and priority of access : Frank 1986; spatial position and priority of access : Johnsson 1993;weight: Dugatkin and Ohlsen 1990). Consequently, attempts to link dominance and fitness have met with mixed results, causing the evolutionary significance of the dominance concept itself to be called into question (for review: Fedigan 1983).…”
Section: Onfusion and Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations