1976 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Including the 15th Symposium on Adaptive Processes 1976
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1976.267702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status report on the generalized likelihood ratio failure detection technique, with application to the F-8 aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first place, they can be adapted to utilize the residuals of an existing filter with relative ease, and a wide range of procedures--from the simple statistical tests of Mehra and Peschon [26] to the more complex GLR method of Wiilsky et al [28], [29], [38], [43]---are available, offering various tradeoffs between performance and complexity. In addition, since we implement a Kalman filter based on no failures, we suffer no performance degradation prior to detection, unlike, for example, the Beard-Jones approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the first place, they can be adapted to utilize the residuals of an existing filter with relative ease, and a wide range of procedures--from the simple statistical tests of Mehra and Peschon [26] to the more complex GLR method of Wiilsky et al [28], [29], [38], [43]---are available, offering various tradeoffs between performance and complexity. In addition, since we implement a Kalman filter based on no failures, we suffer no performance degradation prior to detection, unlike, for example, the Beard-Jones approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial results are reported by Chow et al,in [38], and a description of a detailed methodology will be reported in the near future, (see Bueno et a!. [43]). In addition to the calculation of PF and PD, the comparison methodology reported in [43] includes the computation of cross-detection probabilities--i.e, the probability of detecting a failure of type A when a failure of type B has occurred.…”
Section: I(k)= ~ ~/'(J)v-'(j)y(j)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations