2009
DOI: 10.3368/le.85.3.515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status Quo Effect in Choice Experiments: Empirical Evidence on Attitudes and Choice Task Complexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
96
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A reason for this might be that inhabitants of BB have more substitute sites such as lakes available in their surroundings and therefore have less strong preferences for changing the current water quality of the river stretches. Alternatively, it is discussed in the literature whether such a finding is the consequence of a status quo bias, i.e., that respondents have an unduly propensity to choose the status quo option (Lanz and Provinz [34]; Meyerhoff and Liebe [35]). While not determining the motives for choosing the status quo option here, we assume that with 82 percent of the respondents at least once choosing an option with an improved water quality and a positive price the survey is not impaired by a status quo bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A reason for this might be that inhabitants of BB have more substitute sites such as lakes available in their surroundings and therefore have less strong preferences for changing the current water quality of the river stretches. Alternatively, it is discussed in the literature whether such a finding is the consequence of a status quo bias, i.e., that respondents have an unduly propensity to choose the status quo option (Lanz and Provinz [34]; Meyerhoff and Liebe [35]). While not determining the motives for choosing the status quo option here, we assume that with 82 percent of the respondents at least once choosing an option with an improved water quality and a positive price the survey is not impaired by a status quo bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the economic analysis was at the core of the WFD implementation 32 process from the beginning, estimating the benefits associated with a good ecological status was not 33 originally on the agenda. It was latter on suggested by researchers to employ economic valuation 34 when the need to define disproportional high measurement costs became evident (Brouwer [1]; 35 Hanley et al [2]). Meanwhile, several studies from across Europe determining the benefits of 36 changes in water quality have been presented, e.g., Bliem and Getzner [3]; Brouwer et al [4]; Glenk 37 et al [5]; Kataria et al [6], and Metcalfe et al [7].…”
Section: Introduction 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. Ausblendung einzelner Merkmale), vermehrte Wahlen der status-quo-option oder Tab. 2: Auszug aus der datenmatrix id cset Alt Alt1 Alt2 Alt3 info Zeit kost Wahl Alter 2 4 1 1 0 0 1 16 500 1 30 2 4 2 0 1 0 0 2 250 0 30 2 4 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 30 2 5 1 1 0 0 1 8 20 0 30 2 5 2 0 1 0 0 30 100 1 30 2 5 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 30 3 4 1 1 0 0 1 16 500 0 40 3 4 2 0 1 0 0 2 250 0 40 id kennzeichnet die einzelnen Befragten, cset meint nummer des choice-sets; Alt bezieht sich auf die jeweilige Alternative im Choice-Set; Alt1, Alt2, Alt3 sind alternativenspezifische konstanten mit der Ausprägung 1, wenn die jeweilige Alternative vorliegt; info ist eine ordinal kodierte Variable für das informationsattribut mit den Ausprägungen 1 = einfach, 2 = umfangreich und 0 = keine informationen; Zeit bezieht sich auf das Attribut "Wartezeit für die testergebnisse"; kosten auf das Attribut "kosten des tests"; Wahl gibt die gewählte Alternative pro choice-set an, und Alter bezieht sich auf das Alter der befragten Person völlige Antwortverweigerungen (Auspurg et al 2009;deshazo und Fermo 2002;hensher et al 2005;Meyerhoff und Liebe 2009;swait und Adamowicz 2001). derartige effekte sind jedoch durch einhaltung der oben genannten methodischen richtlinien gering zu halten (hensher 2006).…”
Section: Diskussion Und Resümeeunclassified
“…In environmental DCM applications, an ASC is usually added to capture differences in utility between the status quo alternative (or an 'opt-out' alternative) and the other choice options. It may be possible to assign a behavioural interpretation to the status quo option, for example related to protest attitudes (Meyerhoff and Liebe 2009), if the attribute levels used to describe the status quo also appear in the designed part of the choice experiment. If this is not the case, however, it is not possible to estimate the difference in utility between the baseline level of the attributes (used in the status quo option) and the reference level (the lowest level appearing in the designed part of the choice experiment).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%