2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-6485.2004.00112.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status Preference, Wealth and Dynamics in the Open Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that the reaction of r e to a rise in l is ambiguous, because, on the one hand, the market rate of return r = F k increases, while, on the other hand, the status-dependent component, which equals c (k; l) k 1 , declines. 7 More speci…cally, a rise in _ w=w by one percentage point causes the growth rate of labor supply to rise by 1 percentage points and the growth rate of labor demand to fall by 1 percentage points.…”
Section: Employment Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Observe that the reaction of r e to a rise in l is ambiguous, because, on the one hand, the market rate of return r = F k increases, while, on the other hand, the status-dependent component, which equals c (k; l) k 1 , declines. 7 More speci…cally, a rise in _ w=w by one percentage point causes the growth rate of labor supply to rise by 1 percentage points and the growth rate of labor demand to fall by 1 percentage points.…”
Section: Employment Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In equilibrium, the growth rate of employment rises by less than one-for-one, since a rise in the growth rate of wages-generating an increase in the growth rate of labor supply-is required to maintain equilibrium in the labor market over time. 7 In order to obtain a di¤erential equation for equilibrium employment in the form…”
Section: Employment Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Consumption externalities have also been used by authors such as Abel (1990) and Galí (1994), to study asset pricing, while Ljungqvist and Uhlig (2000) employ the "Catching-up-1 Another branch of the macroeconomic literature in this area assumes that social standing depends on relative wealth, rather than on relative consumption. See, for example, the recent work of Jeanne (1997, 2001a, b), Futagami and Shibata (1998), Fisher (2004), Van Long and Shimomura (2004a, b), and Fisher and Hof (2005a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 An alternative branch of this line of research speciÞes that status depends on relative wealth, rather than on relative consumption. Recent authors who have employed this approach include Corneo and Jeanne (1997), Futagami and Shibata (1998), and Fisher (2004). Fisher (2004) shows how relative wealth preferences can be used to obtain-in the context of the small open economy Ramsey model with perfect capital mobility-an interior, steady-state saddlepoint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%