2016
DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000000412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status of NCRP Scientific Committee 1‐23 Commentary on Guidance on Radiation Dose Limits for the Lens of the Eye

Abstract: Previous National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) publications have addressed the issues of risk and dose limitation in radiation protection and included guidance on specific organs and the lens of the eye (NCRP 1987, 1989, 1993a, 1993b, 1995a, 1995b, 2000b, 2001b, 2010a, 2010b, 2013). NCRP decided to prepare an updated commentary intended to enhance the previous recommendations provided in these earlier reports. NCRP Scientific Committee 1-23 (SC 1-23) (NCRP 2015) is charged with prepa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new NCRP report asks for additional research and longer follow-up of those exposed to radiation. (Dauer et al 2016;NCRP 2016). This development is emphasizing the need for more research to set improved dose limits for the public.…”
Section: Biological Effects Of Low Doses and Medium And High Doses Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new NCRP report asks for additional research and longer follow-up of those exposed to radiation. (Dauer et al 2016;NCRP 2016). This development is emphasizing the need for more research to set improved dose limits for the public.…”
Section: Biological Effects Of Low Doses and Medium And High Doses Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this recommended lens-of-eye dose limit has not yet been implemented in the United States, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) recently reviewed the available epidemiologic literature (47) and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP) is preparing an updated commentary addressing the issues of risk and dose limitation in radiation protection and including guidance on the lens of the eye (48). At the same time, various shielding strategies have been investigated to evaluate their impact in reducing the eye dose in fluoroscopy (4853). For example, using an anthropomorphic phantom and a miniature solid-state dosimeter positioned at the phantom’s eye, Thornton et al (51) evaluated the impact of common shielding strategies, used alone and in combination, on the scattered dose to the fluoroscopy operator’s eye.…”
Section: Radiation Effects Of Cardiovascular Imaging: Non-carcinogenicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In discussion, PAC 1 considered the recommended dose-limit changes particularly noting that while cataracts seem to be benign because surgery can easily repair the problem, for those doing close work, the surgery is often not optimal and sometimes surgery is not successful. Papers summarizing this work have recently been published (Dauer et al 2016, 2017). …”
Section: Current Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%