Status of Instrument Landing Systems

Jackson, W.E.

doi:10.1109/jrproc.1938.228214

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Navigation Systems For Uav Landing 21 Instrumental Landing S...1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1940

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article6

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An ILS [36,37] consists of two main parts: the ground part, that sends the signal, and the airborne part, that receives and processes it. The ground equipment (see Figure 1) includes the following: a directional beacon (DB), glide slope beacon (GSB), inner marker (IM), middle marker (MM), and the outer marker (OM).…”

Section: Navigation Systems For Uav Landing 21 Instrumental Landing S...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Ground-Based Passive Reflectors for Improving UAV Landing

Yasentsev

Shevgunov

Efimov

et al. 2021

Drones

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article reviews the problem of landing on hard-to-reach and poorly developed territories, especially in the case of unmanned aerial vehicles. Various landing systems and approaches are analyzed, and their key advantages and disadvantages are summarized; afterwards, an approach with passive reflectors is considered. A formal definition is provided for the main factors relative to the accuracy analysis, and a model is presented. The way to improve the landing procedure, while simultaneously meeting various practical constraints, is analyzed; the results of numerical simulation are presented, followed by the detailed conclusion describing still remaining challenges and subjects for further research.

show abstract

Section: Navigation Systems For Uav Landing 21 Instrumental Landing S...mentioning

confidence: 99%