The grey seal was a common species along mainland Europe during the Stone Age (8,000-5,500 BC). Along the North Sea coast populations started to decline substantially during the 11th century as a result of excessive hunting. The last breeding populations disappeared in the 16th century in the Wadden Sea, and before 1900 in the Kattegat-Skagerrak and the Southwestern Baltic as a result of an extermination campaign. No regular pupping occurred along mainland Europe until the end of the 1970s, when a breedin… Show more
“…In the Kattegat they disappeared before 1900, and the present low numbers originate from both the northeast Atlantic and the Baltic (Søndergaard et al 1976, Härkönen et al 2006. Grey seals equipped with satellite transmitters showed highly migratory behaviours (Dietz et al 2003, S. Brasseur & P. Reijnders unpubl.…”
We present new and revised data for the phocine distemper virus (PDV) epidemics that resulted in the deaths of more than 23 000 harbour seals Phoca vitulina in 1988 and 30 000 in 2002. On both occasions the epidemics started at the Danish island of Anholt in central Kattegat, and subsequently spread to adjacent colonies in a stepwise fashion. However, this pattern was not maintained throughout the epidemics and new centres of infection appeared far from infected populations on some occasions: in 1988 early positive cases were observed in the Irish Sea, and in 2002 the epidemic appeared in the Dutch Wadden Sea, 6 wk after the initiation of the outbreak at Anholt Island. Since the harbour seal is a rather sedentary species, such 'jumps' in the spread among colonies suggest that another vector species could have been involved. We discussed the role of sympatric species as disease vectors, and suggested that grey seal populations could act as reservoirs for PDV if infection rates in sympatric species are lower than in harbour seals. Alternatively, grey seals could act as subclinical infected carriers of the virus between Arctic and North Sea seal populations. Mixed colonies of grey and harbour seal colonies are found at all locations where the jumps occurred. It seems likely that grey seals, which show long-distance movements, contributed to the spread among regions. The harbour seal populations along the Norwegian coast and in the Baltic escaped both epidemics, which could be due either to genetic differences among harbour seal populations or to immunity. Catastrophic events such as repeated epidemics should be accounted for in future models and management strategies of wildlife populations.
KEY WORDS: Epizootic · Harbour seal · Mass mortality · Phocine distemper virus
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherDis Aquat Org 68: [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130] 2006 natural reductions in food supply driven by El Niño conditions have led to high levels of mortality (Trillmich & Dellinger 1991).There is also increasing evidence for mortality resulting from infectious disease. In 1988, up to 60% of North Sea harbour seals Phoca vitulina died during an outbreak of a then newly discovered distemper virus identified by inclusion bodies (e.g. Dietz et al. 1989a, Bergman et al. 1990. This virus was isolated and described as a morbillivirus, phocine distemper virus (PDV) (Osterhaus & Vedder 1988). Subsequently, related dolphin and porpoise morbilliviruses were isolated from cetaceans (Barrett et al. 1993), and widespread screenings suggest that many populations of pinnipeds, cetaceans and sirenians in the North Atlantic had been exposed to these viruses prior to and after the 1988 PDV outbreak (Dietz et al. 1989b, Duignan et al. 1995a,b,c, 1997a,b, Van Bressem et al. 2001. Clinical signs of disease were not recorded in many of the populations in which morbillivirus antibodies were detected (Duignan et al. 1995b, Nielsen et al. 20...
“…In the Kattegat they disappeared before 1900, and the present low numbers originate from both the northeast Atlantic and the Baltic (Søndergaard et al 1976, Härkönen et al 2006. Grey seals equipped with satellite transmitters showed highly migratory behaviours (Dietz et al 2003, S. Brasseur & P. Reijnders unpubl.…”
We present new and revised data for the phocine distemper virus (PDV) epidemics that resulted in the deaths of more than 23 000 harbour seals Phoca vitulina in 1988 and 30 000 in 2002. On both occasions the epidemics started at the Danish island of Anholt in central Kattegat, and subsequently spread to adjacent colonies in a stepwise fashion. However, this pattern was not maintained throughout the epidemics and new centres of infection appeared far from infected populations on some occasions: in 1988 early positive cases were observed in the Irish Sea, and in 2002 the epidemic appeared in the Dutch Wadden Sea, 6 wk after the initiation of the outbreak at Anholt Island. Since the harbour seal is a rather sedentary species, such 'jumps' in the spread among colonies suggest that another vector species could have been involved. We discussed the role of sympatric species as disease vectors, and suggested that grey seal populations could act as reservoirs for PDV if infection rates in sympatric species are lower than in harbour seals. Alternatively, grey seals could act as subclinical infected carriers of the virus between Arctic and North Sea seal populations. Mixed colonies of grey and harbour seal colonies are found at all locations where the jumps occurred. It seems likely that grey seals, which show long-distance movements, contributed to the spread among regions. The harbour seal populations along the Norwegian coast and in the Baltic escaped both epidemics, which could be due either to genetic differences among harbour seal populations or to immunity. Catastrophic events such as repeated epidemics should be accounted for in future models and management strategies of wildlife populations.
KEY WORDS: Epizootic · Harbour seal · Mass mortality · Phocine distemper virus
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherDis Aquat Org 68: [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130] 2006 natural reductions in food supply driven by El Niño conditions have led to high levels of mortality (Trillmich & Dellinger 1991).There is also increasing evidence for mortality resulting from infectious disease. In 1988, up to 60% of North Sea harbour seals Phoca vitulina died during an outbreak of a then newly discovered distemper virus identified by inclusion bodies (e.g. Dietz et al. 1989a, Bergman et al. 1990. This virus was isolated and described as a morbillivirus, phocine distemper virus (PDV) (Osterhaus & Vedder 1988). Subsequently, related dolphin and porpoise morbilliviruses were isolated from cetaceans (Barrett et al. 1993), and widespread screenings suggest that many populations of pinnipeds, cetaceans and sirenians in the North Atlantic had been exposed to these viruses prior to and after the 1988 PDV outbreak (Dietz et al. 1989b, Duignan et al. 1995a,b,c, 1997a,b, Van Bressem et al. 2001. Clinical signs of disease were not recorded in many of the populations in which morbillivirus antibodies were detected (Duignan et al. 1995b, Nielsen et al. 20...
“…Thus, vital rates cannot be transferred from other populations uncritically. On the other hand, the Baltic grey seal has most likely been isolated from other North-East Atlantic grey seal populations for less than 9,000 years (Härkönen et al 2007) and they share many basic biological features with other grey seal populations. Our approach has been to utilize data from other grey seal as a 'best guess' and adjust values when information from the Baltic was available.…”
Section: Population Survey Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hunting caused regional extinctions of grey seals in France, the Wadden Sea, the Kattegat-Skagerrak, the Limfjord, the southern Baltic (Härkönen et al 2007), and the US Atlantic coast (Barlow et al 1995). After protective measures were undertaken in the mid 20th century, some of these regions have been re-colonised since the 1970s.…”
Section: Hunting and Historical Extinctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After protective measures were undertaken in the mid 20th century, some of these regions have been re-colonised since the 1970s. However, reproducing grey seal populations are still absent from several regions where they were abundant only 2 centuries ago (Härkönen et al 2007). Thus, experience tells us that grey seals are vulnerable to hunting pressure and great care should be taken if hunting is introduced.…”
Section: Hunting and Historical Extinctionsmentioning
The grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) population in the Baltic Sea is recovering after a century of bounty hunting and 3 decades of low fertility rates caused by environmental pollution. A conservative estimate of the population size in 2003 was 19,400 animals, and available data suggest an annual rate of increase of 7.5% since 1990. The growing population has led to increased interactions with the fishery, and demands are being raised for the re-introduction of the hunt. We provide a demographic analysis and a risk assessment of the population, and make recommendations on how to decrease the risk of overexploitation. Although hunting increases the risk of quasi-extinction, the risk can be significantly reduced by the choice of a cautious hunting regime. The least hazardous regimes allow no hunting below a 'security level' in population size. Obviously, to implement such a hunting regime detailed knowledge of the population size and growth rate is required. It is not possible to estimate "true" risks for quasi-extinction, but we used an approach where the relative difference for different scenarios can be compared. With a security level at 5,000 females, the population quasi-extinction risk increases 50 fold at an annual hunt of 500 females compared with a scenario with no hunting. The risk of quasi-extinction is very sensitive to declines in the mean growth rate and to increased variance in growth rate. The variance in the population estimates over the last 14 years imply that it would take 9 years to detect a decline from 1.075 to 1.027 in the rate of population increase. We also show how the age composition of killed animals influences the impact of the hunt. The overall recommendation is that hunting should be kept to a minimum, carefully documented and accompanied by close population monitoring.Harding, K.C., Härkönen, T., Helander, B. and Karlsson, O. 2007. Status of Baltic grey seals: Population assessment and extinction risk. NAMMCO
“…For example, the number of harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) in Sweden and Denmark has increased by more than 500% in 30 years (Figure 9.5). Also, in recent years the grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) has slowly started to recover after its near-extinction in the Nordic region about 100 years ago (Härkönen et al 2007). The positive trends are mainly due to bans on seal hunting and protection of breeding sites.…”
Section: 6: Proportion Of Norway's Coastal Zone Affected By Buildingmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.