Status of a protected area system in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas: An analysis of PA coverage

Abstract

SUMMARYMultifaceted patterns of protected area (PA) expansion are reviewed considering: i) the increase in PA number and coverage; ii) distribution and extent of important bird areas (IBAs); and iii) distribution and coverage of global biodiversity hotspots and the Global 200 Ecoregions that fall within the Hindu Kush-Himalayas (HKH). The analysis revealed that biodiversity conservation is a priority for the eight regional member countries of the HKH, who have established 488 PAs over the last 89 years (1918 to 2007). The eight countries sharing the HKH have committed 39% of this total geographical area to the PA network and 11% to IBAs, which is quite significant when compared to the global target of 10%. There has been an increasing trend in PA establishment over the last four decades. The PA coverage within the HKH of China alone is significant (35.5%), followed by India (1.46%) and Nepal (0.58%). When IUCN management categories are considered, the majority of PAs belong to Category V (39%), followed by Category IV (29%). Only 0.6% of PAs are managed as Category I, and, in recent years, Categories V and VI have increased. Of the total HKH geographical area, 32% is covered by four global biodiversity hotspots and 62% by the Global 200 Ecoregions. However, only 25% of the global biodiversity hotspots and 40% of the Global 200 Ecoregions are part of the PA network. There are still numerous gaps in conservation in the HKH. Coordinated and committed efforts are required to bring other critical habitats within the PA network in the HKH.

Understanding forest fire patterns and risk in Nepal using remote sensing, geographic information system and historical fire data

“…Forests are the main source of timber and fuel wood, and also a major source of fodder for livestock. Nepal is home to 35 forest types, 75 vegetation types and 118 ecosystems, along with four global biodiversity hotspots (Chettri et al 2008). However, these ecosystems are facing challenges due to natural and anthropogenic induced climate change.…”

Linking Spatio-Temporal Land Cover Change to Biodiversity Conservation in the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal

“…Likewise the Wild Water Buffalo, Indian Bison and Bengal Florican showed narrow habitat choice. In the matrix analysis, swamps/marshes scored the highest species number with 15, followed by forest (14), river and lake (13) and grassland (12) and the least by agriculture (2). It was observed that forested ecosystems of the KTWR are one of the most important habitats used by 15 globally significant species followed by river and lakes and grassland.…”

“…By 2100, the impact of land use change on biodiversity is likely to be more significant than climate change, nitrogen deposition, species introductions and changing atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide on a global scale [10,11]. This has a strong implication on conservation and management of protected areas at global, regional and national levels, which are the store house and repository of a wide range of biodiversity [12][13][14][15].…”

Species and habitat conservation through small locally recognised and community managed Special Conservation Sites

“…Recent information suggests that the Himalaya which forms the northern border of the Indian subcontinent is one of the most biodiversity rich regions on the earth. But sadly many of the taxa found here have been listed as critically threatened revealing the imminent threats posed to the wildlife of the region (Chettri et al 2010). The critically threatened species include Gharial Gavialis gangeticus, South Asian River Dolphin Platanista gangetica, Pygmy Hog Porcula salvania, several species of vultures, Bengal Florican Houbaropsis bengalensis, etc.…”