1998
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1998)127<0957:satote>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and Trends of the Endangered Colorado Squawfish in the Upper Colorado River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct enumeration of fish populations is not feasible in turbid rivers, and removal estimates are unreliable because of the difficulty of blocking reaches of large rivers to meet the model assumption of no migration. Instead, closed-population, multiple mark-recapture estimators (Otis et al 1978;Burnham et al 1987;Chao 1989;Osmundson and Burnham 1998) are recommended for deriving population point estimates and to guide development of sampling designs that conform to these models. The accuracy and precision of each point estimate will be assessed by the Service in cooperation with the respective recovery or conservation programs, and in consultation with investigators conducting the point estimates and with qualified statisticians and population ecologists.…”
Section: Demographic Criteria and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct enumeration of fish populations is not feasible in turbid rivers, and removal estimates are unreliable because of the difficulty of blocking reaches of large rivers to meet the model assumption of no migration. Instead, closed-population, multiple mark-recapture estimators (Otis et al 1978;Burnham et al 1987;Chao 1989;Osmundson and Burnham 1998) are recommended for deriving population point estimates and to guide development of sampling designs that conform to these models. The accuracy and precision of each point estimate will be assessed by the Service in cooperation with the respective recovery or conservation programs, and in consultation with investigators conducting the point estimates and with qualified statisticians and population ecologists.…”
Section: Demographic Criteria and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish population studies by Osmundson and Burnham [1996] indicate that there are perhaps only about 600 Colorado squawfish remaining in the upper Colorado River (defined here as the reach upstream from the confluence with the Green River, Utah, to Palisade, Colorado). The largest concentration of adult Colorado squawfish in the upper Colorado River is found in reaches near Grand Junction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppression of the natural flood regime can result in disruption of spawning behaviors, a loss of access to rearing habitat for juvenile fish, and reduced recruitment (Osmundson and Burnham 1998;Modde et al 2001;Bunn and Arthington 2002). For fish species such as Oregon chub that presumably rely on floods for dispersal, alteration of the natural hydrologic regime often results in population isolation and loss of gene flow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%