2004
DOI: 10.1017/s095927090400036x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and trends of Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica in Europe and Africa

Abstract: Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica is classed as Endangered in Europe (Tucker and Heath 1994, Hagemeijer and Blair, 1997), but there have been no detailed studies of the trends in the different populations occurring in Europe and Africa. Here we study the status and trends of the species in Europe and north and north-east Africa. We estimate the total population at 10,500–12,900 breeding pairs, and recognize two biogeographical populations in this region. The western population, comprising colonies in nort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Terns deployed with a PTT lasting longer than 12 months exhibited a return to San Diego in the spring the following breeding season, and all terns that were tracked longer than 18 months returned to the same winter locations that were used the previous year, suggesting that there is a strong degree of fidelity to both breeding and winter locations within the San Diego breeding population. Breeding location fidelity has been reported to be low to moderate in Gull-billed Terns along the Atlantic coast (Erwin et al 1998;Miller et al 2013;Gochfeld et al 2019), but it is noted as varying widely between nesting locations in Europe (Møller 1982;Sánchez et al 2004). We are unaware of any other research focused upon Gull-billed Tern wintering site fidelity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Terns deployed with a PTT lasting longer than 12 months exhibited a return to San Diego in the spring the following breeding season, and all terns that were tracked longer than 18 months returned to the same winter locations that were used the previous year, suggesting that there is a strong degree of fidelity to both breeding and winter locations within the San Diego breeding population. Breeding location fidelity has been reported to be low to moderate in Gull-billed Terns along the Atlantic coast (Erwin et al 1998;Miller et al 2013;Gochfeld et al 2019), but it is noted as varying widely between nesting locations in Europe (Møller 1982;Sánchez et al 2004). We are unaware of any other research focused upon Gull-billed Tern wintering site fidelity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2019). In Eastern Europe, the Gull-billed Tern is listed as endangered with a suspected population decline of 30% throughout the European range while populations in Asia and Australia appear to be stable (Sánchez et al 2004). The North American breeding population is estimated to be 4,160 to 5,200 breeding pairs (Molina and Erwin 2006;Molina et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nest predation was rarely recorded during our study where the breeding sites of Gull-billed tern were isolated, which may have served as protection against terrestrial mammalian predators, such as dogs, foxes, and rats, as observed in other studies (e.g., Nelson, 1979;Hamer, Schreiber & Burger, 2002). Although the eggs and chicks of Gull-billed tern have been reported to be prey for other bird species such as Great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), Barn owl (Tyto alba), Short-eared owl (Asio flammeus), Yellow-legged gull (Larus cachinans) and Black-headed gull (L. ridibundus) (Sánchez & Blasco, 1986;Sánchez et al, 2004), we suspect that the effect of avian predators in our study was somewhat minimal because only a Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) was observed on a single occasion during our surveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species occupies a variety of habitats that include inland freshwater or saltwater lakes, rivers, and marshes ( Snow & Perrins, 1998 ; Zhao, 2001 ), although it remains poorly studied across much of its range and may have experienced population declines ( Erwin et al, 1999 ; Molina & Erwin, 2006 ). Consequently it is currently listed as conservation concern in Europe, Africa and North America ( Kushlan et al, 2002 ; Sánchez et al, 2004 ; Molina & Erwin, 2006 ; Staneva & Burfield, 2017 ). Gull-billed tern is an opportunistic dietary generalist that uses both terrestrial and aquatic resources in wetland mosaics that mainly includes lizards, flying insects, estuarine fish, and both marine and estuarine crab species ( Bogliani et al, 1990 ; Stienen, Brenninkmeijer & Klaassen, 2008 ; Albano et al, 2011 ; Goodenough, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cramp 1985, Dunn & Agro 1995. The Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica is a particularly opportunistic species which takes a wide spectrum of different sizes and types of prey, including insects, in its breeding habitats (Sánchez et al 1991, Sánchez et al 2004a, Dies et al 2005.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%