Abstract:Agrotis robusta (Blanchard, 1852) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a species of economic importance in South America. This species is considered a pest on seedlings of several crops. Agrotis robusta is commonly confused with and treated as A. malefida Guenée in Boisduval and Guenée, 1852, and only a couple of works cite A. robusta for South America and none mention it as a species of economic importance. The aim of this work is to redescribe and illustrate the adult and male and female genitalia of A. robusta, and … Show more
“…Our findings in Agrotis support the latest morphological studies which recovered Agrotis as a monophyletic group (San Blas, 2015). Furthermore, our result is congruent with systematic studies which considered A. malefida and A. robusta as different species (San Blas, 2014, 2015San Blas and Barrionuevo, 2013), the former sister to A. canities, both closely related by morphology (San Blas, 2014, 2015, and A. ipsilon sister to A. infusa, a close relationship already noticed by Common (1958) due to their morphological similarity.…”
Section: Phylogenysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Despite their economic importance, many species were incorrectly identified for decades. Recent systematic studies helped to solve identity problems within genera of economic importance in South America such as Agrotis Ochsenheimer (San Blas, 2014, 2015San Blas and Barrionuevo, 2013), Feltia Walker (Dias et al, 2017(Dias et al, , 2018San Blas and Agrain, 2017;San Blas et al, 2019), Leucania Ochsenheimer (Cocco et al, 2019;Dolibaina et al, 2019), and Spodoptera Guenée (Brito et al, 2019). Except for Brito et al (2019), all these studies were based exclusively on adult morphology.…”
“…Our findings in Agrotis support the latest morphological studies which recovered Agrotis as a monophyletic group (San Blas, 2015). Furthermore, our result is congruent with systematic studies which considered A. malefida and A. robusta as different species (San Blas, 2014, 2015San Blas and Barrionuevo, 2013), the former sister to A. canities, both closely related by morphology (San Blas, 2014, 2015, and A. ipsilon sister to A. infusa, a close relationship already noticed by Common (1958) due to their morphological similarity.…”
Section: Phylogenysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Despite their economic importance, many species were incorrectly identified for decades. Recent systematic studies helped to solve identity problems within genera of economic importance in South America such as Agrotis Ochsenheimer (San Blas, 2014, 2015San Blas and Barrionuevo, 2013), Feltia Walker (Dias et al, 2017(Dias et al, , 2018San Blas and Agrain, 2017;San Blas et al, 2019), Leucania Ochsenheimer (Cocco et al, 2019;Dolibaina et al, 2019), and Spodoptera Guenée (Brito et al, 2019). Except for Brito et al (2019), all these studies were based exclusively on adult morphology.…”
“…Another organism found in the colony was a Lepidoptera: Noctuidae (larva) (Figure 1, C), with almost 300 species around the world being considered as pests to crop in the majority of cases 18 . However, there is no information about Lepidoptera found in the colony of stingless bees or honeybee of the Apis genus.…”
Bees are the primary pollinators in nature. However, climate change, excessive use of fertilizers and invasive species have caused the decline of bee colonies. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the presence of pests in colonies of Melipona eburnea. For this, the colonies of M. eburnea were examined during the honey extraction process. We found 4 different pests associated with the physical conditions of colonies and the fragile defense of the bees against the invaders. In conclusion, this report of the presence of pests is to alert researchers and meliponicultures to prevent the decline of stingless bees.
“…Apart from the aforementioned programs only few original data are published for host-plant relationships of Lepidoptera and much of the work focused on caterpillars found on plants of economic importance (pests and potential pests) (e.g. [6], [7], [8]).…”
17A total of 130 lepidopteran larvae were selected from 37 fogging samples at the Panguana 18 station, district Yuyapichis, province Puerto Inca, department Huánuco, Peru. Target trees 19 were pre-identified and subsequently submitted to molecular confirmation of identity with 20 three markers (rbcL, psbA and trnL-F). Identification of 119 lepidopteran larvae (92 species) 21 was successful through DNA barcoding: Comparison of COI barcodes with the reference 22 database of adult moths resulted in 65 (55%) matches at species level, 32 (27%) at genus level 23 and 19 (16%) at subfamily or family level. Three larvae could not be assigned to a family. For 24 these larvae the fogged target tree now suggests a potential host-plant relationship. Molecular 25 gut content analysis, based on High-Throughput-Sequencing was successfully tested for ten 26 larvae corroborating feeding on the target plant in some cases but elucidating several other 27 cases of potential 'alternative feeding'. We propose a larger-scale approach using this rapid 28 and efficient method including molecular gut-content analyses for comprehensively testing 29 the ratio of 'alternative feeders' and pitfalls caused by collateral fogging of larvae from 30 neighboring trees. 31 32
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.