2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.93.034001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and prospects of precision analyses withe+eW+W

Abstract: e + e − → W + W − is an integral part of the global precision analysis program which is becoming more relevant after the discovery of the Higgs boson. We analyze the current situation of precision calculations of inclusive e + e − → W + W − observables, and study the prospects of incorporating them into the framework of global precision electroweak analyses in light of per-mil-level cross section measurements at proposed future facilities. We present expansion formulas for the observables, making the dependenc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(148 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in this case the barred fields do not correspond to the physical particles, and the anomalous TGC parameters defined here are not equivalent to the usually used ones defined for the physical particles. However, the barred parameters ∆ḡ Z 1 , ∆κ γ ,λ γ are more convenient for universal theories, since they can be used in parallel with the oblique parametersŜ,T , W, Y ; see [68] for a demonstration in e + e − → W + W − . We will work out the relations between ∆ḡ Z 1 , ∆κ γ ,λ γ and the anomalous TGC parameters in the Higgs basis, which agree with the usually adopted definitions, in section 4 [see (4.14c) and table 8].…”
Section: Jhep01(2016)123mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, in this case the barred fields do not correspond to the physical particles, and the anomalous TGC parameters defined here are not equivalent to the usually used ones defined for the physical particles. However, the barred parameters ∆ḡ Z 1 , ∆κ γ ,λ γ are more convenient for universal theories, since they can be used in parallel with the oblique parametersŜ,T , W, Y ; see [68] for a demonstration in e + e − → W + W − . We will work out the relations between ∆ḡ Z 1 , ∆κ γ ,λ γ and the anomalous TGC parameters in the Higgs basis, which agree with the usually adopted definitions, in section 4 [see (4.14c) and table 8].…”
Section: Jhep01(2016)123mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have seen in section 4.1, the relevant Higgs basis couplings are correlated. The measurements of the TGCs are currently dominated by e + e − → W + W − at LEP2, for which an EFT calculation in the case of universal theories has been presented in [68]. On the other hand, measurement of the spectrum of h → Z + − , a very clean decay channel, will be sensitive to an overlapping set of SMEFT parameters.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For triple-gauge couplings (TGCs) we use the e + e − → W + W − cross-section rescalings at √ s = 200 and 500 GeV calculated in [62]. 7 Using the integration-by-parts identity…”
Section: Higgs and Triple-gauge Couplingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, stochasticity can turn deterministically stable attractors into metastable states [1]. Examples of such extreme, rare events, which may be of key practical importance include population extinction [2][3][4][5][6], switching in gene regulatory networks [7][8][9][10], the arrival of biomolecules at small cellular receptors [11], and power-grid destabilization [12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%